As a low-cost crime suspense comedy, the most basic positioning of its script is still accurate. Two groups of robbers ransack a bank at the same time, one team is a connoisseur, the other team is a native, is it a conspiracy or a coincidence? This is a very interesting material, plus the ghost in the bank, a neurotic uncle who seems to be playing soy sauce but accidentally became a key character, the whole movie scene takes place in that unlucky bank In the beginning of this movie, we lost a lot of baggage to us, but when the plot slowly unfolded, the screenwriter started to be lazy as if he was rushing to get married, and many materials that could be mined were given up, and often very Crude way to end some branches.
Although the screenwriter was a bit lazy, he didn't make any logical mistakes. I think the reason why this film sinks into the sea is still the director. Obviously, the director's scheduling ability in the limited space is not enough, and he does not show the tension and tension that should be in the limited space. The handling of the group drama is a bit too confusing. Organized, the editing is not clean enough, and some places seem procrastination.
But having said that, there is no major plot flaw in this film. Although the reasoning sometimes seems a bit sloppy, it is still reasonable. The integrity and completion of the story are relatively good, and the performances of the actors are also above the pass line. The jokes will not be cold, and the ending is quite Hollywood, and children's shoes who prefer black comedy can try it out.
View more about Flypaper reviews
