plot

Dewayne 2022-03-23 09:01:55

Harry Caul (Gene Hackman) is a surveillance expert who runs his own company in San Francisco. He is highly respected by others in the profession. Caul is obsessed with his own privacy; his apartment is almost bare behind its triple-locked door, he uses pay phones to make calls, claims to have no home telephone and his office is enclosed in wire mesh in a corner of a much larger warehouse. Caul is utterly professional at work but he finds personal contact difficult. He is uncomfortable in dense crowds and withdrawn and taciturn in more intimate situations. He is also reticent and secretive with work colleagues. He is nondescript in appearance, except for his habit of wearing a translucent plastic raincoat virtually everywhere he goes, even when it is not raining.

Despite his insistence that his professional code means that he is not responsible for worrying about the actual content of the conversations he records or the uses to which his clients put his surveillance activities, he is, in fact, wracked by guilt over a past wiretap job that left three people dead. His sense of guilt is sharpened by his devout Catholicism. His one hobby is playing along with his favorite jazz records on a tenor saxophone in the privacy of his apartment.

Caul and his colleague Stan (John Cazale) have taken on the task of monitoring the conversation of a couple (Cindy Williams and Frederic Forrest) as they walk through crowded Union Square in San Francisco. This challenging task is accomplished. After Caul has worked his magic on merging and filtering different tapes, the final result is a sound recording in which the words themselves become crystal clear, but their actual meaning remains ambiguous.

Although Caul cannot understand the true meaning of the conversation, he finds the cryptic nuances and emotional undercurrents contained within it deeply troubling. Sensing danger, Caul feels increasingly uneasy about what may happen to the couple once the client hears the tape. He plays the tape again and again throughout the movie, refining its accuracy (by catching one key, though ambiguous, phrase hidden under the sound of a street musician: "He'd kill us if he got the chance") and constantly reinterpreting its meaning in the light of what he knows and what he guesses.

Caul avoids handing in the tape to the aide (Harrison Ford) of the man who commissioned the surveillance (Robert Duvall). He then finds himself under increasing pressure from the aide and is himself followed, tricked, and listened in on. The tape is eventually stolen from him in a moment when his guard is down.

Caul's appalled efforts to forestall tragedy ultimately fail and it turns out the conversation might not mean what he thought it did - the tragedy he had anticipated is not the one which eventually occurs. In the final scene, he discovers that his own apartment has been bugged and goes on a frantic search for the listening device, tearing up walls and floorboards and ultimately destroying his apartment to no avail. At the film's end he is left sitting amidst the wreckage, playing the only thing in his apartment left intact: his saxophone.

View more about The Conversation reviews

Extended Reading
  • Turner 2022-03-24 09:01:52

    Rewatch. Forgive me for being blind-eyed before. The handling of the sound is astonishing, and while alienating from the picture, another emotional narrative clue is listed. With such a result, the film history may be the first. Coppola's analysis and reconstruction of the scene is also fully revealed in this film. Relying on his familiarity with American traditions to rebel, a lot of omitted editing shots and scenes are exchanged so smoothly. The editing at the beginning is as wonderful as Luo's Iger's "Venice", however, Coppola's most vocal is the sound (eavesdropping and the real opposition) and Roeg, the color (transcendental crisis awareness)

  • Kenyatta 2022-04-20 09:01:41

    This is Coppola's experimental film. The editing and photography have maintained a consistent level. The use of sound effects to create suspense and reflect the psychology of the characters is still very superb. The motivation of the characters is not convincing enough, and the final ending is very "film noir". , also tricked the audience to the end as much as the truth—a film about the life and spiritual crisis of a middle-aged man.

The Conversation quotes

  • Harry Caul: Why are you asking me all these questions?

    Amy: 'Cause it's your birthday.

  • Martin Stett: Some nice Christmas cookies there I made. You want one? They're good.