The male protagonist has no sense of existence, let's talk about the screenwriter's problem. As a veterinarian, even though I didn't take the final exam, I can't say that the first time I saw the horse's hoof, I would be able to say what the problem was, and be domineering. He shot Yinxing with a gun, and when he saw the elephant behind, he was helpless. He would just hang his eyes or smirk stupidly throughout the whole play, not a man at all, I was watching it all for the old showman Christopher Waltz. The flaws explained in the story make the popularity of the male protagonist very blunt and abrupt, and the role of interacting with animals is also very thin. How can the elephant help him kill August? I haven't seen how good he is to elephants.
In short, it should have been a good story, but somehow it makes people feel that it is lacking and not strong enough. Of course, Christopher's performance is still as eye-catching as always. I really like the way he pronounces it, his charming smile, and his domineering decisiveness!
View more about
Water for Elephants reviews
