Did you leak today?

Jacynthe 2022-03-23 09:02:24

In our great motherland, if one day the corrupt wants to punish you, what will you do? It is estimated that 99% of the time, it can only be swallowed. After all, if you reason with the righteous corruption, it will play hooligan with you; if you want to play hooligan with it, it will reason with you. In short, it is an almost impossible task for people to sue officials in the motherland.

But if you have read Mr. Linda's "A Closer Look at America" ​​series, you will know that in the United States, civil lawsuits against officials are very common. This movie tells such a story.

A CIA agent and her husband collect information on Iraqi nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction for the U.S. government. The information shows that there is no conclusive evidence that Iraq is engaged in these activities. But Zheng corrupt still launched the war against Iraq. While her husband's conscience was disturbed, he disclosed the truth to the press, and he was retaliated by the government...

It was a good subject, but unfortunately, it was ruined by the director comrade.

The director spent about half the length of the film telling the foreplay: how the couple collected evidence, how they dealt with characters from various countries, etc., and also interspersed with the story of a former Iraqi scientist... In short, as much as you want. After watching it for more than half an hour, I didn't know what the film was trying to say. It wasn't until halfway through, when my husband revealed the truth to the press, that I had a clue—well, maybe my comprehension was just too bad.

Next, due to the government's retaliation, the couple's life is in trouble and their relationship is tested. But despite doing so much foreplay, the wife's attitude of admitting defeat after a 180-degree turn is confusing. Then I suddenly figured it out for some reason, and it was even more abrupt, without even a minimum explanation. If the inexplicable conversation she had with her father was an explanation, then I was really convinced.

Finally, the couple finally decided to join hands to fight the government. I thought it was time for a climax, but at this moment, the film actually—subtitled for a while! Tell us directly that the couple won and the government lost. But how did you win and how did you lose? - He didn't say anything at all!

The feeling of the whole film is that the director is very good at foreplay, and does foreplay with all his strength. When I entered the state, I was ready to do the right thing, and all of a sudden - the director leaked!

WTF, you idiot!

Digression: Naomi Watts is really getting old. In 1080p high-definition resolution, the wrinkles around the corners of Sister Na's eyes and forehead cannot be blocked even if she is carefully concealed with makeup.

View more about Fair Game reviews

Extended Reading

Fair Game quotes

  • Valerie Plame: [repeated marital conversation] It's on the PostIt.

  • Scooter Libby: Why does the CIA feel the need to "play" these briefings.

    Paul: No, no, what I mean is... Okay look, I didn't mean what I just said.

    Scooter Libby: Which part? The last part? Or other things, too?

    Paul: I'm sorry, I'm getting a little confused.

    Scooter Libby: You want me to come back?

    Paul: No. God no.