The film opens with an explanation of psychoanalysis, which shows that the film uses a lot of psychoanalytic knowledge and we can see it as Hitchcock's homage to Freud, the master of psychoanalysis. Speaking of a few of my main characters, the heroine, the female doctor, and on the male side, I don't think that Dr. Edward (although he is not himself, but let's call him that) is a real male protagonist, but he has the most roles. I think that Dr. Edward only acts as a A patient's character provides the case, and the heroine's mentor I think he plays a big role. The last character is the retiring dean. Dr. Edward is a patient with amnesia, and his memory loss is not a memory storage process. If there is a problem, his instantaneous short-term and long-term memory is intact. He can remember things. He forgets that the key things in the past are temporary amnesia due to the obstacles to extract information caused by interference and other reasons. So this paved the way for Doctor Edward to be cured in the end. In the film, it is repeatedly emphasized that Dr. Edward is emotionally unstable when he sees the striped thing, which is a kind of recognition, and he can still remember some things through memory to prove that his amnesia is not particularly serious, and then I will say One of my favorite characters in this film is the female doctor's mentor. I think he is the most normal person in this film. When I met for the first time, he saw that there was something wrong with Dr. Edward and didn't expose it directly. Then, Dr. Edward was murderous with a razor. Facing him, he calmly and calmly gave Dr. Edward sleeping pills. Here I have a bold idea. I think the director insinuated Freud himself as the mentor of the female doctor, because Freud's famous dream The analysis of the dream and the part about the interpretation of dreams in the back are all completed by the female doctor tutor. Regarding the interpretation of dreams, I also bought the analysis of dreams, but I don’t think I have a deep understanding of this, so I won’t do too much analysis on it.
And the director told the truth that he had too few scenes, but as the character who led the final climax, he had to analyze the movie. The director only did 2 things wrong in his limited role. First, he The wrong thing to say is that the inconsistency has seen Dr. Edward?
One more thing, he didn't shoot the female doctor in the end. He didn't shoot the female doctor. This proves that his consciousness is still very clear about what should be done and what should not be done. He was only influenced by the idea of interests first. That's all, he is the one I sympathize with the most in the whole movie. In the
end, the analysis of the female doctor should be the most necessary for him to analyze. The movie is also known as "Crazy Lover". I think it is obviously aimed at the female doctor. The whole movie The biggest patient is the female doctor, and the movie covers the biggest patient in a good way. I think this is the reason why this movie is said to be a classic. The female doctor fell in love with Dr. Edward at first sight and believed that he was innocent and lost because of it. She set some other criteria for her judgment, took all actions in Edward's favor as the direction of his actions, and implemented them unswervingly. Her ecstasy made her psychoanalysis powerless. Psychoanalysis needs to pay attention to the big problem.
As a summary sentence of my movie viewing, I use an ancient Greek name carved on a stone tablet to say: Man, see yourself clearly.
View more about Spellbound reviews
