Re-architecture, can be upgraded~

Idell 2022-04-18 17:34:52

Out of 10, imagination and creativity are rated 7; the plot, narrative, and story structure are barely passable, and honestly it's not worth staying up late to watch 3:30 in the morning.

To give some constructive comments, everyone can discuss: the story should start from the hero's awakening after 600,000 years (the time machine is not explained at the beginning), due to an accident, he lost his memory. Facing a brand new world, he doesn't know when, where, everything is unknown. In this way, the mutilated moon, the human scalloped lair on the cliff and its peculiar way of life, and the sudden appearance of powerful and ferocious humanoids. . . It can give the audience a full sense of science fiction and suspense. The subsequent development is the decryption mode of a traditional Hollywood sci-fi suspense film. Two-thirds of the film is made by the evolution of human beings underground. The answer is: 600,000 years later, the time machine. The male protagonist was able to put together the broken memories and explain why he came to the future. The subsequent climax finale will be edited, so it will be omitted.

If it feels like this structure, this movie will have more than one grade. You all laugh~

View more about The Time Machine reviews

Extended Reading
  • Leif 2022-04-24 07:01:06

    I'll drop one star after reading the original.

  • Jason 2022-04-20 09:01:41

    I just thought there were a few lines that were pretty good, and the plot was so boring that I wanted to just turn it off. You are the inescapable result of your tragedy.

The Time Machine quotes

  • Alexander Hartdegen: I could come back a thousand times... and see her die a thousand ways.

  • David Philby: [looking at a futuristic picture] I wonder if we'll ever go too far.

    Alexander Hartdegen: With what?

    David Philby: [pointing at the picture] With this. With all of this.

    Alexander Hartdegen: No such thing.