Back to movies. Eighty percent of the audience wanted to strangle the male protagonist to death, and 20 percent of the audience wanted to watch others strangle the male protagonist to death. In the final analysis, what the male protagonist does is that he has not done a good job in ideological work.
Is persuading people to loot the same as persuading people to buy biscuits? After tonight, you must grab it early tomorrow? At least one political commissar should be appointed to stay with him at all times. He should understand the reason and move with emotion. It is best to rise to the level of national justice and national security, so that he will feel that if he does not rob, he will be sorry for the country and the people, and he is sorry for himself. conscience. No hurries? You are almost living on the streets, how can you be more anxious than him? ?
Besides, can robbery be child's play? Is there a research report? Has there been a field trip? Have you rehearsed all possible situations? Dress rehearsal once? not educated! Didn't your parents teach you how to rob a cash truck? Oh shit!
Another point is that the psychological quality is not strong enough. It is also a blockbuster in the United States. People die at every turn in an entire city. It is not uncommon for the earth to explode and human extinction. Does killing someone break down like that? Has the school never organized everyone to watch Lust, Caution? Chinese elementary school students all know that "the school will start if you don't kill people". Look at your break.
The male protagonist locked himself in the car, how he tried to persuade him to stay out, which once again showed the seriousness of ignoring ideological education. This has to be left to China, any old Marxist-Leninist, let alone persuade her to come out, she can cry and die in the car on the spot.
In the end, the brothers finally made up their minds to kill the male protagonist, but can this matter be said in person? "Hey, buddy, pay attention, we're going to kill you." Your parents didn't teach you how to kill? Oh shit!
The money transporter is hard, but it's not a bank safe. If it were me, I could make 10,000 ways to die. But these idiots tragically chose to knock on the door. This is not the door of the widow in the village next door. You knocked on the door, isn't it emotional? Or do you expect to be acquitted in the end for not destroying public property? ?
Magical powers, quickly accept these stupid demons, and suffer in this world.
On the contrary, the male protagonist jumped up and down, bombed the banknotes and rescued the police, climbed the roof to look for the signal, and made a cameo appearance as a Tang monk, saying that the black brother who was going to kill him jumped off the building. Ganqingya is a political commissar and does ideological work for him. Isn't this playing a big sword in front of Guan Gong's door and a hooligan in front of Ximen's high-ranking officials? It's not that the male protagonist is so powerful, it's mainly the brothers who set off him.
Originally, the strength of the male protagonist was a little bit higher than those of the others. Because of the burden of the police, the strength of the male protagonist... was still a little bit higher than those of the others. The unarmed single-handedly singled out the big men with all kinds of iron in their hands to get out of their bodies, and they also gave each one a free one-way ticket to hell. Finally, he put his arms around his brother, smiled, and went home to wait for the bank to collect the house. The majestic music sounded, and the male protagonist left us a high-level back view. This quality education promotional film ends here.
Finally, I would like to say one thing. Don’t introduce this kind of film in the future. It’s completely unnecessary. This kind of screen image and this kind of ending will get a lot of people in my country. We don't bring Lao Mei to play, we'll be greedy for him, hum!
View more about Armored reviews
