From a female CIA agent who was betrayed by the state

Duane 2022-04-20 09:01:59

Barely pass. Doug Liman directed and filmed again after many years. It can be seen that he fully trusts/depends on the two leading actors, especially in a scene where the husband and wife are arguing in the park, facing the immersive interpretation of the two leading actors, holding The photographers are all shy (I support this kind of handheld photography that brings out the feelings of the parties). The plot is divided into two parts, and the style before and after is also somewhat fragmented. In the front is the 9/11 incident. The couple collected evidence of Iraqi research and development of weapons of mass destruction around the world, but found nothing. In the second half, the White House removed the grind and killed the donkey to rectify the couple who did not bring good news. A social topic movie like this kind of adaptation of a true story and a group portrait can easily break the intricate clues. The general way to deal with it is to focus on the narrative, and the other is to mark the stylized visual effects, so that different narrative lines can be used. In terms of presentation, it is recognizable; in this regard, the film is generally done. I can't remember some of the supporting roles, but it does not affect the main line, so there must be problems in the control of this process. In the first half of the scene, the scenes of the fast moving through Africa, Middle East, Southeast Asia and other countries have a good grasp of the details of each country. In the Kuala Lumpur scene, the twin towers are arranged in the corner of the screen.

Renee 2022-03-27 09:01:12

The trivial attraction of political themes, which is boring and no longer important, is not as good as truth first.