But it's just not right, not her fluffy hair, not all of her ill-fitting and bad menswear, not even the suave way she yelled at Geogre several times (Ah, think about how she sat at the dinner table in the movie ).
Oh, how could I forget, she's still such a brilliant conspirator, with so many little bad things and tricks, she doesn't just do it, but she can also watch the development by the side, and then bring it to the fortune when things are unbelievable. Through his little surprised expression, neither the male and female protagonists could see the difference.
I just don't think she is. If you like it, right? If you like it, just say it face to face. Just say it directly. It's better to have another girl present and let the man choose for himself.
If a man loves you, he deserves you. I think he will choose you. Otherwise, you are not suitable to be together. Otherwise, you are just to satisfy your own vanity and possessiveness, regardless of destroying the happiness of a so-called friend and the happiness of an innocent girl. Yes, rights are equal, but you have the freedom to pursue, others don't? When you do, where is the principle of fairness?
I hate this sentence: choose me, marry me, let me make you happy. It doesn't sound like a big problem. . . I'm not so disgusted with competitive love, but sister, you are looking for a lover. On your terms, you are not greedy for money and not greedy for power, right? let me make you happy, do you think this is a dog? I hate inequality in any relationship, SM lovers are not the case here. A person, if he loves you and is suitable for you, he doesn't need and shouldn't wait for you to "give" him happiness, right? It's a matter of two people. When I say this, I just think that what is revealed is the uncertainty in the subconscious (that's why I have to emphasize that I am afraid that the other party does not know or understand), if you know that you are sure that he is very confident that you will be happy together, you don't need to say it. This is it, right?
Forget where I saw it, a good relationship, a good marriage, is like dancing the waltz. Only one side can dance well, and it won't work. It takes two people to be good and understand how to cooperate. Men will bring it? Women won't follow, it's no use. Girls can dance? Men can't take it off, it's useless.
At the end of the scene, Jules returned to her usual free and easy look, and turned with Geogre, her face was her usual real smile. What is happiness? When you are with that person, you are very strong in being yourself, and you are willing to let the difference of the other person lead you into a deeper and wider world (provided that you have good digestion and absorption ability).
Probably the screenwriter didn't want to be too conventional, so the second male protagonist was arranged with different backgrounds, otherwise the hero saves the beauty to the end, happy is happy, but who will watch. But I couldn't stop my evil thoughts, if he was really bent, he wouldn't be interested in the opposite sex. Since he has confessed his interest like this, then, it is bisexual. So, happiness is still there! If I were Jules, I wouldn't waste my time with the first man, and the more time I spent with Geogre, the less my life was too short.
Of course, without learning, how can you grow? I made another perfectionism mistake. Let’s just say that I myself, have not had the experience of a similar agreement? The fact is that the other party's fiancee has changed two (now uncertain), and I even believed it for so many years. . .
By the way, the style of the second male lead and his English accent made me cute again and again, how I wish I could have such a best friend forever, alas. The circle is too small to touch :(
View more about My Best Friend's Wedding reviews
