Maybe my heart is really too hard to watch this movie without feeling at all. I just think that Kate is unfortunate, but compared to those who are living on the streets, they are much better. Her misfortune may only be physical, but in this life, although she has lost a lot, she has a very precious family and even enjoys love. It can be said that the regret is that her life is not long and peaceful.

Another angle of the film is the expression of ethics. Is Anna obliged to donate a kidney for her sister? Is she really just a child born to save her sister? And do her parents have the right to ask her to do these things? The law does not stipulate that minors have The right to act autonomously, but is this ethically justified? There was

a movie made in China. I forgot the name. It was about a couple who had divorced and had their own families, in order to save the sick child and have another child. s story. There are some similarities to the plot of the movie, except that the movie focuses on the time period after the child grows up.

When right and wrong involve emotional choices, it often becomes difficult to judge. Like this movie, Kate's life is important, but Anna's health is not important? Of course, this movie gives the answer, Anna's lawsuit is actually what Kate asked for, and in the end, Anna's victory after Kate's death also illustrates this. But this is not an absolute answer, everyone will have their own views and answers.

View more about My Sister's Keeper reviews