We can look at the differences and similarities between euthanasia and suicide. The motives are generally the same, rational people make rational decisions after thinking, but in fact there are still differences. The traditional concept of suicide , There must be many people with psychological problems, and patients who are willing to accept euthanasia, especially those who meet the standards of Dr. Jack in the film, need to be mentally normal. They just choose one because they don't want to continue to suffer from physical pain. A more decent way to die. The main difference is the method. Traditional suicides are mostly autonomous and do not need help, while euthanasia requires the assistance of a doctor. Traditional suicides are often cruel and painful, while euthanasia is almost painless. In addition, there are differences in the subject. Most of the patients who choose euthanasia are patients who are unable to commit suicide by other means. They are terminally ill, and it is meaningless for them to continue to maintain their lives.
It can be seen that, in fact, what we need to discuss is not whether doctors have the right to perform euthanasia, but whether patients have the right to choose euthanasia, or whether people have the right to commit suicide? If so, shouldn't the patient be allowed to commit suicide because he is incapable of suicide? If so, can't suicide victims choose a more decent and comfortable way to bring their life to a better end? If not, is suicide itself a sin? Does this sin hurt anyone other than God? If an action isn't hurting or even affecting anyone, why limit it?
Where do human rights come from? As far as my current knowledge is concerned, I think there are many things that people are capable of doing, and what people are capable of doing, as long as they do not threaten or harm the society and others It should be human rights, human freedom. Thinking, eating, drinking, talking, sleeping, writing, etc. are all human freedoms, while theft, murder, robbery, rape, etc. are all recognized as illegal and sins because they hurt others and disrupt the social order. If we have to count religions, then for Christianity, except for the believers of this religion, are they all outlaws? Dr. Kevorkain also said during the debate: Strictly speaking, any work of a doctor is blasphemy, taking medicine and surgery, which are all interventions on the human body, are unnatural, and are life given by God Disrespect.
So, I still don't think it's controversial.
It takes courage to change. I think even if most people have approved things, when a few people make a decision, they will still hold back. Sometimes they don't know why they can't change, so they use the so-called "existence is reasonable". Rogue theory to explain.
Another point, since this film involves a lot of legal scenes, let me review the judicial system of the United States by the way. In Linda's "A Closer Look at the United States", I really understand what is a real legal country, people You have the right to express your dissatisfaction with the government and the law through demonstrations, but as long as the current law is still in effect, you must abide by it for one day. Even if you are dissatisfied with the law, you can try to appeal, and if you can successfully send the case all the way to the Supreme Court , and won the case, then you have changed the law through your own efforts, because the Supreme Court's judgment results have great reference value for similar cases in the future, and at the same time passed the Supreme Court's approval, which means the day of formal legislation not far. The laws of a country with a rule of law are constantly changing in accordance with the changes in people's thinking. Some laws are always time-effective. When the times are changing, people's concepts are also constantly changing. Because of such a mechanism, Let the legal provisions be self-improved little by little, from the bottom to the top, and from the top to the bottom at the same time, in order to ensure the validity of the existing laws and the real legal system of the society.
View more about You Don't Know Jack reviews
