After watching monster, I finally understand what it means to be ignorant, and I also understand that being able to be ignorant is actually a great thing.
Some people used to say that the topic should be generalized. I have always been very poor at this kind of exercise, because an article can be summarized in a few sentences by a very smart person, which is so goddamn. Of course a stupid kid like me wouldn't understand. And the more the article or movie can't be summed up in a few sentences, it should be ignorant.
Monster, a popular name like that. There's nothing special, just like when I used to write an essay called Xiao Ming, then it must be the male protagonist, it's natural. So the filter in the brain will naturally filter out. Precisely, I was used to the hunting game of monster hunter during this time, and reluctantly started qvod. It is estimated that it is due to the hobby of hunting monsters.
However, when the hero and heroine were separated by the soldiers at the last moment, it was like a minor tune that finally came to an end and stopped (in fact, because the title was not watched well, I don't know that this was the beginning of the cup). A perfect love ditty, I don't know what to call it. Because I can't sum it up in one sentence, like I used to sum up an article. But it is indeed a love film, but this love film has an accusation against the right (this kind of leftist intellectual complex has always been in the film, in fact, there should be more right-wing filmmakers, like Quentin, well Balance it), there's a whole bunch of monsters, an American neighbor whose "mercy" and childish altruism are shared by left-wing intellectuals. Connecting all this with a line of love, the means are clever and the cost is low. Make it smart. This layout is really neat. This is the overall structure, and a movie like this is very clever.
After setting up the structure, the actors are another highlight. To be honest, the heroine gave me the same feeling as Faye Wong in the Chongqing Forest. I like it very much. It's very real, not artificial. Later, when I learned that the two were still a couple, I was convinced by the director. He is a very smart director, and he thought of such a subtle level. First of all, if a couple comes to make a couple film, the actors don't need to be very professional at all, they feel it as soon as they come up, and they are quite natural. The delicate tacit understanding and intimate atmosphere between the couples are easily captured. Secondly, such casting will naturally reduce costs, because there are definitely not many cases of ng, and two people together must be cheaper than one trick. It's really hard to choose a character. I've always said that architects and directors are very similar, they are very similar.
Such a movie combines so many elements, but the priorities are quite clear. In many cases, the quality of a movie depends on some choices. For example: Chibi, I think there are so many so-called big names that are actually I really don't know what it means, because he has kneaded it all in, but he kneaded it very poorly. Although the main line of a film is anti-cao, but the main line is turned around in different places, giving many unwarranted branches, such as raw cowboys. For example, the appearance of Lin Chiling did not help the main line, but distracted the focus of the main line. Of course, this is a need for commercial films, but the more commercial films are, the more intelligent you need to use this need. will only lead to failure. And this so-called literary theater work has a good grasp of this main line. The appearance of monsters has a great catalytic effect on the emotions of two people. Every time it appears, it will further the relationship. This is the role of monsters , and even by the end, the monster’s humanized reunion and separation fit perfectly with the main line. In the end, the theme fell on people, and many questions were raised. What is a monster? what is love? What is life? How is this world? Me and you. . . Can so many things be said in one sentence?
No, so it's really a movie I don't know what to call it. A movie with a clear main line that I don't know what it's called is a great movie. However, I don't know if the so-called so-called is not what the director is after? It's not a given answer, he's just asking.
View more about Monsters reviews
