View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews
It would be too exhausting to discuss a movie without a forum.
Jaylen 2022-03-23 09:02:44
Absolutely good film, the role of the acting school is to attract people to watch the seemingly bland content attentively. There are a lot of good lines in the film, which are written for those who stick to their beliefs or insist on being correct. In one sentence, the film critic said that the informant was too young, even if she confessed, it didn't matter. The reason was correct, but the reason why the protagonist would rather endure all kinds of pain and pressure than expose the informant and the informant's age has nothing to do with it. , because of a promise made by the protagonist, and to a child of an age who is still crazy to accept new things and establish values, keep his promise just so as not to affect the child's values and beliefs.
Extended Reading
-
Dorthy 2022-03-21 09:02:43
The female reporter played by Kate Beckinsale is an idiot typical American movie ps. Great ending
-
Wilbert 2022-03-28 09:01:07
Compared to the ups and downs of the story, the movie seems gorgeous. An individual, especially a female reporter, is how easily his life can be destroyed and how easily his energy is consumed in the face of power; the resistance of daily life is easier said than done. ps1. Your partner must have the same values, otherwise you can't really hurt; 2. Alan in "The White House" is the most suitable to play the barrister, someone with a presidential image! ╭(╯3╰)╮
-
Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!
-
Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.