Religion, there is always faith.
As Confucian students, we always emphasize Confucianism and Confucianism in private and public, and Confucianism teaches people to be kind and live a harmonious life, etc. But as a believer, I must be right because one is right and one is wrong, one is better and one is better, as a person, I cannot escape . Not better, why did you choose it?
This film has documentary value, and for me, it has the effect of broadening my horizons and verifies some conclusions I have seen from philosophy books. List the following first:
1. Although Christianity and Islam share the belief in GOD, their theology is inherently conflicted and exclusive.
2. Mormonism, Scientology, Cannabis, etc. do exist in Salt Lake. Although incredible.
There are many mistakes, so I will not be wordy. There is a big problem in choosing a religious category, and it is not right to reflect the religious side. But these are not fundamental. The fundamental question is: Is it true that people have no ability to think about the ultimate problem?
Wittgenstein admits that this part is beyond language. I admit.
However, if there is only so-called reality in the world, it can be expressed clearly and distinctly in language, I am just a "logical engine". I am too bored. I am too lonely. I am too lonely.
what is love? Is it just a kind of attachment that maintains the bond between people in the process of human evolution, naturally produced in society. Not also. Is my lover already "no"? where is she lost? I must find her.
Of course, criticizing this movie like this is a bit too much. Just to express one thing, we have the ability to think about the ultimate.
And we can bring Mr. Dai Zhen's tradition of simple learning into our beliefs, bring Zhu Zi's thinking about the ultimate into life, re-examine life with the help of Yang Mingzi, and Dong Zi to look at the world.
One more question:
War, killing people, is it a political issue or a religious issue?
If the Communist Party, which aims to unite people all over the world, will have conflicts with each other because of the nation-state, then why should they not add fuel to the conflict when the two religious groups are in conflict?
The gap between the two religious groups is unimaginable for a non-believer. What you believe, I know nothing; what I obey, how can you understand? From this perspective, religion drives war.
Here, I don’t want to mention world ethics, etc., and I don’t want to use false history to prove that there is no religious persecution or conflict in China, because both Chinese Confucianism and Indian Buddhism have historically excluded dissidents. It's heavy and light. Believe it or not, believe it or not.
However, I would like to ask:
Without religion, there would be no war?
What about the world war?
View more about Religulous reviews
