This re-enactment is simply a copy of imitation. While losing the essence of the original, it uses clumsy means to tease the audience instead.
Optical camouflage clothing and optical camouflage skin
In the original version, Motoko Kusanagi used optical camouflage, which is a tights. In the reissue, the setting of camouflage clothing was canceled, so that Motoko's skin has the function of optical camouflage directly. I really want to ask why Mamoru Oshii made such a low-level modification?
(Oshii Mori: This will allow Motoko to run naked in front of the camera with her big boobs exposed ^^) If it is for the pursuit of sexiness, isn't tights more sexy than nakedness? Such changes can only please those migrant workers with low aesthetic tastes.
The gender
of the puppet master is male in the original version, but changed to female in the remake. The meaning of the male setting is the union between the two sexes in nature, creating a new life; what is the meaning of the two women's getting together? It can only be to meet the lustful needs of otaku.
A good movie in 2D and 3D
should at least have a unified picture style as a whole. The replica version is simply 3D for the sake of 3D, resulting in a serious dislocation of the picture style. It is simply two movies that are interspersed with each other.
Why did Mamoru Oshii make such a film? There is only one answer, money.
View more about Ghost in the Shell 2.0 reviews
