Ridiculous believe

Abby 2022-03-23 09:02:24

Like I've always said man lives by believing.
Although sometimes what you believe is not necessarily true.
But it's not this that I'm talking about, it's religion!

Let's get down to business:
Religion is the hardest thing to say. Because this thing is about what many people "believe", what many people live by. I have met many devout and kind believers who have been preached by pastors, teachers and even classmates. Precisely because I am a largely agnostic and also have my own non-religious beliefs, I am indifferent to their efforts, and at the same time, I am still interested and curious about their beliefs and ideas. Just like the teacher Maher in the film, he always likes to ask people some challenging questions. "You think virgins can give birth to children! Come on!" "If God is holy and omnipotent, why doesn't he just destroy evil?"...
Whenever this happens, the answer is basically the same "You don't believe in miracles. , but I believe" "God has a reason that we ordinary people can't understand" This situation is like answering "I don't care, in short, I just believe that God exists". However, at the same time, what everyone calls "God" is so different.

Teacher Maher's film is too humorous~ especially his cold humor.

After all, in my opinion, religion is essentially a tool. Since it is a tool, there must be positive and negative sides. It has good points, such as promoting "good" and combating "evil"; people who suffer from this can get spiritual comfort; many people can find their own groups; many devout believers are also great people. But at the same time, the contradictions and errors of the world can also deepen or become violent; it is much more convenient to use religion to manipulate people; killing and fighting in the name of religion become irreconcilable.
The direct object of the tool of religion is people's "belief". It is better for others to master this tool than to master it to control yourself. Just like the law, its function is indeed to maintain social order, and it is something that individuals can use, but the right to interpret the law is only in the hands of some people.
Eastern religions are quite different. For example, Chinese Buddhism is mostly a tool for praying and seeking blessings (at the same time, Confucianism and other thoughts are implemented to form a kind of learning, which is also very different from Western theology). Taoism is mostly a tool for health preservation.
When discussing with a friend once, he said, "It is better to have faith than no faith." Now it seems "perhaps, it is good to have a means to control 'belief', but if you are controlled by others, it is better not to."
Doubt is always a good thing means. I doubt that "the Bible is a completely fabricated story", "Jesus was a lunatic who ate the fruit of the yellow spring", "isn't the world a better place without religion?" Such doubts are enlightening, but have no practical value. In the end, you have to draw your own attitude and conclusions. So question humbly and take control of your beliefs.

View more about Religulous reviews

Extended Reading

Religulous quotes

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] What about when innocent people get killed during a "defensive action"?

    Michael Bray: I'm for that. Yeah. It's collateral damage.

    Bill Maher: But it's acceptable?

    Michael Bray: We've got to consider what the real issue is here and what the cost is and the risk.

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] This is the Anne Frank house, when you see it you really understand how true that phrase "The banality of evil" really is. One of the common arguments in defence of religion is that Hitler wasn't religious and neither was Stalin or Mao and they were bad so religion is good. But like religion itself it's an argument that really depends a lot on not thinking too deeply. For one Hitler himself didn't eliminate anyone personally he had a lot of footsoldiers most of whom were good Christians and they pushed people into the ovens. Religion has done a bad job of stepping up and preventing violence-prone bullies from doing their thing. If anything it usually justifies acts of madness. And 20th Century Fascism and Communism while not strictly religions as we've come to think of religion, really were religions. They were state religions. Hitler was seen as infallable and Godlike. Hirohito was absolutely a God on Earth to the Japanese people. We shouldn't get too hung up on the word religion. The bottom line is whether people think and act rationally or not and whenever they organise their lives around something that could best be described as groundlessness bad things happen. Even if the central story seems harmless like there's a God who loves you so much that he had his only Son whacked so that you could keep on sinning. Still, doesn't matter, once reality has left the building, once it's up there in the ether then anything can be extrapolated or tacked on by Preachers and Priesthoods and delusionals and power-hungry pricks. It's not that big a step from "your God is the only God and he loves you very much" to "you really should get out there and start killing for him" Whenever people believe in something utterly groundless because they were told it by a charismatic preacher and Hitler was nothing if not that, all bets are off. Nazism was a religion, a religion based on the insane fiction that Jews were subhuman vermin who did not deserve to live, but people and people not from a primitive society believed it because A they liked the preacher, B the other sheep around them were buying into it even though it was crazy and C it was inextricably tied to their view of a glorious Valhalla-like future. A, B, C. Religion.