What's wrong with this movie? Split the first part, don't watch it. Many of the laughs are very low-level. Although the old woman is not as amazing as Uncle Dafoe, the strange tone is also quite interesting. The fighting scenes between the two brothers are also very popular, kind of the first part. The slightly contrived beauty has also continued, so what are you dissatisfied with? He is the Executioner, so the bad is bad. I don't know why the first one became a so-called niche classic. It's nothing more than adding a little religious element to a revenge story, but it has nothing to do with religion, just like Artest's face is full of defenses.
His pace is still slower than the green car. This is just a kind of pretense . For one reason or another, it was made into a classic redemptive religious action ethics film. I think the director initially just wanted to make a cool, NB-friendly low-budget action film. I think he did. The second generation is very successful. The second generation is serious. It is just the completion of a story. The old man is just talking about juvenile madness.Do you really want Jesus to come down from the sky at their call with a submachine gun and shoot the bad guys with the middle finger?
View more about The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day reviews
