I didn't understand at first, the beginning of the film is a fixed picture, the light white subtitles come out, and the letters are arranged neatly one by one, with a kind of rigor. A long time has passed, a person has passed, a long time has passed. A car passed by and I started to even suspect a movie card.
Facing such a long fixed shot, when I was eating in front of the screen, I felt like a voyeur. At this time, it was a little hairy. As the plot of the movie unfolded, it turned out that we were watching the video tape that the couple watched together, the movie Most of them are fixed and quiet images, only at this time, you can't tell whether this shot is a TV shot or a camera shot, I don't know if I can express it clearly, when the childhood friend behind was crying alone in the room, it also happened. Using such a method, it will make people feel that they do not know whether they are voyeurs or voyeurs. Either way will make people feel the chill in their bones.
There are a few scenes in the middle that I don't understand, and there are a few rare horror scenes in the middle, that is, the scene where a little boy coughs and bleeds is George's son. I didn't see clearly, because I skipped the scary scene, and after watching it. I think it may be the childhood friend, because George said that his childhood friend was ill, in fact, there is no way to verify what George said, because he told a lot of lies in the film. But if not, I can't find any connection.
Then George clashed with the black guy on the bike
and then the joke didn't get it, but it was a shock indeed.
And then did George finally die?
In the last scene, the woman who entered and exited twice is Piehou's mother?
Because I didn't understand, I read some comments from other people, and I saw that a Butto said something very interesting. He said that the film is about the debt and repayment of debts between three generations: (Original)
The first generation is the generation of the protagonist George and Majid's parents. The relationship between them is obvious. The French of George's parents killed a lot of Majid's parents.
Compensation, or repayment of debt, by the first generation of French to the second generation of Algerian descendants.
But this compensation was undermined by George, the second-generation Frenchman, when it narrowed down to George's house.
But the irony is that the second generation of French people who should now be able to afford debt repayment compensation, the generation represented by George, was the one who destroyed the debt repayment of the first generation.
And judging from the entire narrative of the film, George, the second-generation French, seems to be unable to repay his debts. This inability created the most shocking scene in the film. For the sake of protecting those who didn't watch it, I won't mention this scene here. In short, almost everyone in the movie theater took a deep breath when facing this scene. Incredibly talented, extremely shocking footage. (I watched this scene frame by frame, it's really genius, it doesn't look fake at all)
The end of the final film is on the third generation, Majid's son found George's son, I don't know the two What was said, it seemed to be a good talk. (This is true, I saw Majid's son introduce himself, then raised his head and smiled) And the end of the film, like the beginning, is still a set shot - a group of French chattering on the steps student.
The camera stayed in this picture for a long time, and it also ended in this picture, it seems to remind us that in the face of the problems that the first two generations could not solve, what about the third generation?
Also: The film premiered at Cannes in May last year, and riots broke out in Paris in October.
I think netizen butto's explanation of the last fixed shot of the film is not bad. After reading a lot of netizens' film reviews, I think I understand a little bit now. It not only involves trust between people, racial barriers, and even social unrest.
In fact, this is how a good movie can make you vaguely understand, but you must be able to clearly understand some things from it, such as mutual trust between people, rationality in everything, and courage to face fear.
The rigorous and tidy pictures and wide-ranging angles of the whole film impressed me deeply. I think watching a movie is like this. People with more connotations will see more things. People who want to seek something will see something. The look of a silent book that allows people to see themselves.
View more about Caché (Hidden) reviews
