This reminds me of after the so-and-so movement, so-and-so said: The intellectuals are in the middle, and the two sides are not people!
The government thinks that you intellectuals are not good for provoking the people, and that the role of the masses as the intellectuals is not complete, so you will know nothing about it.
The rationality of the intellectuals meets the irrationality of the revolution. Who do you reason with? Even silence is sinful.
Need to choose a position - when standing in line, she said: I believe in philosophy!
As a result, both the government and the people laughed.
Rational ambiguity is ridiculous, even cowardly and shameless in the face of sports.
Overwhelming some people with a doctrine, driven by enthusiasm, violence, so justified.
Those who use love as the banner, those who use the nation as the banner... Solzhenitsyn reflected in front of the camera, why do people fight back and forth, because people are also creatures.
As for the banner, it depends on what is popular.
The key point is that our female philosopher is actually very gentle. She cares more about celestial movements and not politics, but politics cares more about her.
Thinking of Lin Zhao... that violent, that tragic.
The so-called right of heresy, haha, it's all a joke. Didn't someone just become Mandela years ago?
Then what?
View more about Agora reviews
