There's no mama America

This film should be given five stars, not because of his content or technique or anything else, but because of his moral, or his existence itself should be highly rated. Once I saw a Maoist counterattack, saying that you people who claim to be democrats are always in the United States, as if that was your mother. This film tells us that there are no American mothers on this planet, there are only human beings of the same species, and some may cause different historical customs.
CCP has never been good, at least from its propaganda point of view, the United States is an interest group, Oh, it should be said that the interests of different classes, the representative of the ruling class. Must be able to speak crap. Even the Americans want to tell us this, Bush, company A, company B, consortium C, multinational company D and so on... Actually, I'm very pleased, the old beauty is not much better than us, and many people have watched this film I laughed, but I almost cried. Has anyone noticed that the film said Bush Sr. used the ex-presidential prerogative, but he was one of the rare people who did so. I think of Clinton in Davos on TV the other day, and some other characters that I only have silhouettes in my mind.
I think of President Washington, who is unwilling to be re-elected for two terms. Although he was also criticized in the later period of his administration, he is also unwilling to face that kind of politics that makes trouble for nothing. I wonder what was going on in the minds of those founding heroes sitting in Philadelphia. Why wasn't it a trick of kleptocratic restoration, and why didn't they feel oppressed by the colonial rule of British imperialism? Why did their compromise, called the great compromise, fail to destroy their revolution? Like I said about Avatar, Americans don't feel that Pandora people have "human rights", and they don't feel that black people have "human rights", or it should be said that at least the representatives of the South do not want to realize it for complex reasons, while some of the North The representative can only hold back temporarily. Where are they not better than us, Hamilton and Jefferson will have a lot of arguments, but they are still arguing, just like this documentary, people no longer want to pay attention to the director who is in front of the Capitol Hill, but there is no People arrested the director as a mentally ill person, or drove him out of Washington, or asked the state's security guards to control the situation.
The CCP is really right. What they take is good words, good goals and good ideals for the common people, but have they done that? Or work in that direction? If we do the same as other people, change the outline, dare to teach the sun and the moon, and the result is that we don’t have to hurt our muscles and bones from the top to the system, then what is the difference between us and them? Hehe laughed out loud, saying that looking at the United States is just like that, are we proud of it? Is this the late mover advantage? Or really let Mao Zuo talk about how our present is not as good as in the past, and we need Mao-like figures to lead.
Mao also has Mao's charm. The parliamentarians are reluctant to send their children to Iraq, but Mao's son is buried in North Korea. I don't know if I should say that this prevents us from appearing in North Korea's "Old Kim, Da Kim, Little Kim". Tragedy, but Comrade Anying did end up in another land, for his own ideals, and for a war that may be as deceptive as the Iraq war.
We also have people like the Philadelphia Conference. Those people are not much smarter than us. The more they understand democracy, the more they know their own insignificance, and the more they know that they cannot tell what democracy is. Because they will say no absolute freedom, respect is a big part, so let's assume such a thing. A democrat is imprisoned by tyranny, and the jailer treats him well, with sympathy, respect, and even discussion. He will focus on tyranny, forgetting that jailers are also a part, maybe we should discuss whether people should submit to tyranny, and the inherent morality of the rule of law. But, no one remembers this, doesn't it matter?
I stopped almost immediately when the film discussed the tyranny of terror and checked the release date of V for Vendetta. Fahrenheit 911-2004, V-2005, you know, there are always some coincidences, coincidences or not, people are paying attention to this issue, sometimes the horror is foreign, sometimes the horror is made, and maybe no one is better than the other Noble, because this is not an excuse for tyranny.
There's no mama America. Don't talk about who's better than who, we can do it, if we all want to. We are all just human beings.

View more about Fahrenheit 9/11 reviews