After reading some comments, the parallel universe is almost the same. Instead of analyzing it from a macro perspective, I feel that the ability to learn computers is a little better to explain the macro. Many people may be very depressed after reading it. What a broken ending means that there is no explanation for it, so let's take a guess!
1. Joe killed the living object. According to the living object, Joe will become his substitute, that is, a new generation of living objects. Maybe his history will be erased. Why hasn't Joe's history been erased?
Possible explanation: Joe returned to his own space, and the previous living objects had been wandering in the space that did not belong to him. This explanation raises new questions: Why is JOE able to return to his own space? This question should directly point to why the previous living objects are free in the space that does not belong to them, that is, what happened in the first place? This question feels like there should have been a sequel.
2. Why did JOE bring back ANNA when JENNIFER opened the door?
Possible explanation: The person in the room can get to the destination by imagining where he wants to go each time the door is opened. Originally, we only knew that when we opened the door from the inside, we imagined the location outside, because we ignored the fact that there is not only one room, but there are actually many rooms. The room can also be selected, as long as the door is opened from the other side, you can reach different rooms. Therefore, JOE only needs to imagine that he is going to the room where ANNA is locked when someone opens the door outside the door, so that JENNIFER can open the door and see ANNA. The question that brings up: Why did Joe himself come to ANNA's room? It's not hard to explain, because JOE is already an item. Question 2: Why didn't Joe open the door outside and imagine the room where ANNA was locked up? I do not know either. Perhaps imagining the destination can only be achieved in the room. A detailed analysis is not clear.
3. The ending is indeed a bit inexplicable. Maybe because the screenwriter wants to give an explanation in the second season, the above only discusses possible explanations from the ending plot, and the systematic explanation may not be given by the screenwriter himself. Personally, I think that this is not entirely a science fiction drama, it is somewhat religious, because I don't believe in any religion, so I can't say anything in depth. Just a reminder: Ruber seems to have been straying from the main line of the story. He doesn't have any relatives or loved ones to save. He just has a feeling of being called. Finally, he comes to the conclusion that he is a prophet. Is he just an old lunatic?
View more about The Lost Room reviews
