It is really not enough to express such rich historical figures in movies. People who are unfamiliar with history don’t know the background at all, and need a lot of foreshadowing, otherwise they will be in a fog, but those who are familiar with history already know the ins and outs, and the film can easily lose its appeal. To please the two, maybe you can only Making a fuss from the details and focusing on the little things, the charm of history is always the positive force of the film.
Cate's youth with Robert before he went to London, and then Robert's betrayal, is really like the first time in life. The history books certainly wouldn't say he betrayed the queen out of love, if ever.
The image of Joseph Fiennes' Shakespeare has been deeply rooted in my heart. Although there is no such high-level film since then, it does not affect the charm of this man at all. Especially after the conspiracy was exposed, he sat there drinking very sullenly, and faced the Queen's questioning, saying that any man would be corrupted by the Queen's love, and his heart would be broken,,, from the tips of his hair to the tips of his fingers, all emitting Charm,,,,,
Because Closer doesn't have a good impression of Clive Owen, but it also indirectly shows his acting skills. A few days ago in the Pacific Ocean, I saw a lightbox advertisement he made for a male cosmetics, and suddenly felt very manly. Even if Elizabeth really has a man's heart, she is still a woman after all, and she will occasionally indulge her cowardice, even if it is only for a second . When she met this explorer, the feeling of a girl in the green age came to her heart again, so the Queen, who was usually polite, educated, cultivated and atmospheric, would also lose her temper because of the man she couldn't get.
Historical films are hymns to their protagonists, any advantages will be magnified infinitely, and any shortcomings will be turned into white jade and slight flaws with fun mirrors.
View more about Elizabeth: The Golden Age reviews
