It seems bloodier than before, and I can't take it anymore.
I remember that Hoffman had been tested and played Game, but I felt that Jigsaw never trusted him.
People have no right to decide the life and death of others, is it really because they have not felt the despair of death?
It can be said that, just as the ancients said do not do to others what you want to do, when your desire to survive reaches the same level as others, your fear of death will not be weaker than others.
In other words, in society, people must put themselves in the shoes of others and experience what others feel, in order to make correct choices from the perspective of others.
So what is the right choice? Is it the self-righteousness of some people?
I think there will be different judging criteria. Those that can be recognized by everyone are usually those that others can empathize with and conform to moral standards, even if they each use their own as their starting point; those that can be recognized by society are often at odds with the former.
When the male pig's feet successfully passed the games, what he got was the judgment of others.
The reality is that, while you are self-righteous, or fearlessly making choices for others, you are being treated the same way by others.
Is this the helplessness of the way people communicate, or is it inherently self-serving?
Have fantasies about a more perfect world.
View more about Saw VI reviews
