Yes, ordinary adventure plots require sacrifice, rescue, friendship, faith and other elements to polish and give some meaning, but incompetent screenwriters will only use the worst plots to express, and even unscrupulous in order to achieve their goals, such as plots that require hostages , just let the number 2 hero, no matter that the enemy is N times larger than the number series? No. 2 is not No. 7, why not hide with No. 9? In order to show the courage of No. 2 and achieve the purpose of being captured, the low-level screenwriter can only sacrifice the IQ of No. 2 at this time. I'm afraid it's not enough to write more than a thousand words...
The director's question: He seems to think that only a full anthropomorphic can be exciting enough, a robot full of flesh, sackcloth like skin, and it will hurt when it breaks, creating opportunities Human beings to the robots, ah, what a poor way!
Structure: It is mentioned in the film that No. 1 to No. 9 are the divisions of the scientist's soul. Due to the eccentricity of the screenwriter, No. 9 has the most benefits, No. 1 is the most pitiful, and has the most stubbornness and conservativeness. In the end, the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 8th also ascended to heaven and returned to God, and nothing happened. He kept shouting "Stop, you are destroying civilization!", but destroyed it with his own hands. oh, civilization might be referring to 9 of them? In the end, only the protagonist + "woman" + "two children" are left (I've had enough...), why does No. 9 bother to save them? If it is said that the ascended and the left can form a meaning, then it is too far-fetched for the 9 things of the same nature to be divided into two different forms to work together.
Story background: At first, I thought it was an old-fashioned machine's backlash against people, a dystopian sci-fi animation. It was not explained until I saw a video of a scientist. This is about human nature, a sci-fi literary film. The evil in human nature has created the mother of today's machines, and the derivation of the scientist's soul is to preserve the good side of human nature (of course, some cowardice and stubbornness are mixed, as a contrast between courage and wit... alas, grass...). Oh, their existence is a continuation of human existence. In this regard, I said weakly, it is as meaningless as a man dying and still leaning a few bars...
View more about 9 reviews
