Continuing the story, maybe the mistress didn't die, maybe the wife didn't sleep with the best friend, how will the story go? The husband was between two women, on the one hand his happy family, and on the other, he told his mistress to "give him a little more time, he is going to divorce his wife". How would the story unfold if the wife believed in the immediate happiness, if the mistress believed in the husband's promise?
Or, do all the parties know the truth? It becomes a who knows more game. Will the game end happily?
There is also an ending in which all of the above stories may have come to fruition. Injury - became the center of the conversation. Who is the injured person? This husband? Or a mistress? Or wife? Still a good friend?
The story continues. The husband is the epitome of five men, and the story affects five wives, and five or more women outside of the wives. How far will this game of deception go.
A promise and agreement that five men need to keep, is broken by a corpse. The corpse was the mistress of one of the men. Who is the murderer? How does this story end?
"Injury" appears again, this time the harm is created by all the co-workers through the narrative.
The narrator cannot break a "principle of ignorance." The individual narrator cannot be a master of the avatar, which makes the narrative story single-pointed, that is, in the process of telling the story, you think this is the whole thing, but it is not. Because your attention is drawn to what's in front of you, you don't know what's going on behind you. And once the story behind you can have a direct impact on the event in front of you itself, it's complicated and bad. But complicated and bad things are indeed a reality.
Each of the five husbands doesn't know the stories of the others, who in turn influence their own lives. The film successfully strips away the relationships behind these characters, and the truth—who is the murderer—becomes bland as the story is restored from multiple perspectives. But the damage was the whole building built together, and no one was spared. This contest of highly skilled deceivers—narrators—fails each as he falls into ignorance of the facts behind him.
The four men who co-fabricate the facts in the film did not win based on this logical falsification. On the other hand, it can also be said that the story is a "fake" revelation, and everyone was present to participate in it. Not only the four men, including the police, wives, lovers...
The hurt is branded in their hearts, and no one can escape. Everyone sees the other party's harm to themselves, but ignores one point, that is, they also participate in this harm at the same time. Not just because you were transformed into another master storyteller in another context, but because you were willing to cause the damage.
Trust, every narrator hopes that his audience can believe his story (of course, the narrator secretly rejoices, thinking that only he knows the truth). Here, it cannot be said that the hopes of the narrators are really in vain, because the lover is hurt because he believes the husband’s narration, and the wife is hurt because he believes in the deception of the husband, but after the twists and turns, the husband is also hurt. The second is a double trauma from a friend and a wife...because you choose to believe, then you naturally take the risk of such damage.
View more about Loft reviews
