"Quran" said this, so I didn't add quotation marks, but it must have contributed to the Quran, so I added the title of the book ~~~~~~~ Violence is generally considered to be attached to people, but I don't think so. I feel it is independent, separate from people, like evil. I think it has the same root as evil, or itself rooted in evil. So I advocate nonviolence. This film is exactly the annotation of my point of view. Two families, one violent and one peaceful. Violence breaks the peace - not one family breaks the other, because the Justin family doesn't want to aggressively violate the other family at all, they just want to run away safely. Father Justin's words, but there is no way out now. When violence meets peace, the only result is aggression. So they hold Mary and her friends hostage. Violence begins to spread, and violence begets new violence. Escape requires resistance, resistance requires violence, and violence leads to further intensification of contradictions and destruction. Half dead. Justin's family stays at Mary's house, a second encounter between violence and peace. The Justin family endured their violence and kept the peace. But what has been broken can never be restored to its original state, but sometimes, the brokenness is hidden, and sometimes it is manifested. Justin's family is relatively unfortunate, and theirs didn't hide for long. Get used to peaceful families, get used to peaceful handling. The first thought was first aid, but when they picked up their handy weapons, the priority became revenge. The so-called iron contains violence. So they fought, and then they slaughtered. Violence destroys violence itself. At the end of the film, Justin's father's head is blown off. This family is over. But what will happen to the Mary family? Will they restore peace? We don't know. But when they pick up the hammer and use the microwave again, will they have a unique spiritual experience?
View more about The Last House on the Left reviews
