Is it Diane's lust or the furry's autism? I see neither. It's a struggling overstatement. Why do people only see the rich and lusty side of Diane's family. Is it only to imagine the film as a history of lustful middle-class ladies? I knew from the first act that what was draped over Diane was human hair or something. At first I thought it was something like a super-spiritual artistic pursuit. But I was wrong, slowly introduced by the director is Diane's pedantic married life without any joy. Did you notice a scene? He was there laughing when Diane kissed her husband's hand. I think anyone who is more sensitive knows that he just thinks of Diane as a dog or something, and there are details throughout the show that say her husband only thinks of her as a weirdo and that marrying her is nothing more than coveting Diane beauty. In particular, Diane's big woman has completely inherited her father's "advantages". In the film, Diane moves forward bravely and dares to explore, to pursue the behavior she really needs to make her more beautiful. The Hairy Man was just a shadow, and Diane saw what she longed to know. That is freedom, true spiritual freedom. When Diane saw the hairy man commit suicide, she cried and put on the hairy man's clothes made of his own hair, and she felt like he was by his side. In particular, the picture book Maoren gave her after her death inspired her to pursue her ideals. So she went away and abandoned all her loved ones who loved her. Although according to Chinese tradition, this is simply outrageous. It's a pity that it is the United States, a country with aspirations. She proved she could do it, and she went. Especially the "Can you tell me a secret?" at the end gave people a foreshadowing humor that made me smile. I couldn't help but say "Go on! Diane. Go and pursue your dreams."
View more about
Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus reviews