The cold recording of life is like the impression of an imbecile reporter visiting the families of the victims in the fire. Is it a problem or a topic?
In the era of blogging when you can type, a bunch of Internet rumors are still rampant, everyone is an expert, or maybe it’s just because the Internet has inflated the individual?
Watching the protagonist holding the camera die in order to give the world the truth (the woman in white took out her luggage from the trailer and was attacked by the actor who played MUMMY before, and the protagonist was actually recording with the camera), although there is a lofty ideal, what is the use? . At the end of the film, he accuses human beings of using zombies as living targets, which is shameless. I only feel the benevolence of women. How can the director play with blood plasma and try to profit (all kinds of zombie death methods are like strange tricks) and slap him in the face. George A. Romero's film status is too special but trying to put too much thought into the genre he is good at is just not clear, the whole film feels to me like someone wants to be good and has to make money The money is average, the two sides are not flattering, and in the end, it is only a failure.
View more about Diary of the Dead reviews
