Don't compare this with the genius JFK. It's easy for others to complete 3 or 4 narratives in the same small scene. Just compare it with the more stable Recount in this regard. They are all multi-line political events within a limited period of time: Recount handles them in an orderly manner. Although several lines are intertwined, they are very clear. Under this clear vision, the dramatic tension is pushed to a climax by changes one after another; this TBIS Well, it is also playing with multiple lines, but almost none of the lines are clearly stated. Basically, it is confusing and confusing, and suddenly there is a very dramatic plot. , ms is very cool, but just like the suspense counterexample that Hitchcock cited - a bomb that exploded suddenly, it doesn't help the whole plot, and where it is unclear, it is still unclear.
As a manifestation of this confusion, TBIS simply did not know how to apply real documentary footage. JFK is the pinnacle of this again, with a dizzying mix of truth and falsehood, narration, illustration, assumption, emphasis... Almost everything that a real documentary shot in a feature film can achieve, it has achieved; in TBIS, except for the ending, I I don’t know what the purpose of those real documentary scenes is. They often jump out at the end of one stage of the plot and enter the next plot. The plot is almost completely unconnected with the previous one. Sometimes it makes me feel like some domestic TV series in the early years. In order to save money, "stealing" the documentary is a lazy practice of war scenes.
In addition, this film has inherited a habitual way of the left and left, replacing logical plots with slogans. If the complicated issue of supporting and opposing the WTO is simplified, it can be regarded as a commercial consideration for the film, which is still understandable, then the behavioral logic of the characters in the specific plot progression is a lack of consideration by the director. The same character, after several scene changes, without a good foreshadowing, has a huge change in behavior, which is unforgivable. Similarly, putting a halo on the head of some characters (African leaders, French scholars) a priori and rudely pouring love on them like foot-washing water only makes people feel the naivety of the director. It's not good to say it, I really let the director to talk about it. I'm afraid he can't talk about anything. He will only say like that angry young man: You xxxx are controlled by a big xxxx group, and this xxxx world has been controlled by xxxx for a few times. century! Alas, Shitou's conspiracy theory about his assassination is at least justified. What about this film? The shrew scolded the street ears...
What is the good thing about this film - the opening scene, the scene where a person suddenly appeared in the empty mirror and went to hang the banner was very impressive, but unfortunately, the setting at the back ruined this good subject. .
View more about Battle in Seattle reviews
