When the reporter interviewed this matter, I think it was just digging a hole for the interviewer to jump in, and the person who wanted to jump didn’t feel that there was a trap at all, and jumped willingly. If you want people to jump, you have to go around him three times and two times. When the interviewer is confused, he accidentally reveals his true feelings like Zhu Jun. The greater the detour, the more the opponent can relax his vigilance, and the greater the possibility of actively jumping into the pit. The intention should not be obvious, just like if you want to ask a strange woman's phone number, you have to ask her so that she doesn't think you are flirting with her, wanting to date her, or even have sex, this is the level, and only when you have level can you get on art.
I finished watching "Conversation with Nixon" over the weekend, and it's been on my hard drive for a long time. I've never been interested in it. I've never been interested in politics, and it's also about the Watergate incident. What can I say? Besides, my knowledge of history is limited. , I may not fully understand it after reading it, and it wastes the film and time. I plan to make up for the history class, or learn some background knowledge. It's not too late to read, but in the end I don't have time, so let's just read it, so as to free up the urgent hard disk for other things.
What surprised me was that the film did not make me, a historical blind person, feel that I didn't know what to say, but made me watch it in one go and enjoy it with relish. In other words, this movie simplifies complex events, breaks historical chapters and takes small paragraphs, so that it becomes a popular movie that is highly entertaining and entertaining to the public.
The actual dialogue between the two in the movie is not much, and the focus is on the preparation before the dialogue and the rendering of the disparity in strength, so the hard-won, shocking reversal in the end is a great treat. In the first three of the four dialogues, Nixon prevailed, and the 11-0 victory was effortless, but the old man Nixon stumbled over the crucial Watergate incident. When the truth was revealed, his face was full of tiredness, regret, and a tear or two that he held back. , such a flesh-and-blood president freezes the most regrettable picture. Even if a person makes a big mistake, he can wipe his hands and burn incense by holding a candle with sincerity.
After reading it, I found a few things related to the interview, and chatted with a smile:
First, no matter how strong the opponent is, there is no need to panic. The reason why others are strong is not because you are weak, but because you are not ready, you have not done enough homework, and once everything is ready, you can stumble upon God, of course, if you are face to face with God. On the contrary, no matter how trivial the opponent is, underestimating the enemy is a fatal mistake, and there is no such thing as disparity in strength.
Second, everyone has weaknesses, and they are powerless to attack, and they still hurt their hands. Of course, the premise is that there is no rule that you are not allowed to play down, otherwise you will hurt people and cut off their children and wait for jail time.
Third, don’t miss the opportunity to talk nonsense at the right time to distract your attention. Like the country where your shoes are made, your phone call last night was boring. In short, try to have something in your words. When he is distracted and thinking, you can laugh. Because this is the easiest way to be caught off guard by your next question, and then either be silent or confess your true feelings to you, of course, provided that you cannot make excuses, otherwise you will fabricate facts and wait for the court to call.
Fourth, rhetoric can’t cover up the truth. Ghosts do something wrong, and they are afraid of people knocking on the door. If you call it thousands of times, it will panic if it doesn’t come out. He also privately reflected on his loss. Tell the man-eating beast to stop eating people, and you may be the next shit it pulls.
To sum up, fifth, politics, interviews and love words are essentially the same, say what you don't believe but want others to believe.
Nonsense, the above five points are not completely correct, nor are they all wrong. I don’t care if you think they are right or not, believe it or not, I don’t care.
View more about Frost/Nixon reviews
