A film that discusses morality itself should be a javelin throwing over the bottom line of morality

Lennie 2022-03-24 09:02:25

Because of the influence of the original novel, I cannot view and evaluate this film fairly.
This film is more like a European literary film produced under the American industrial production system. Maybe because of the length of the film, the plot cannot be Convincing, high-exposure applications are both highlights and failures.
In terms of the film's temperament, director Fernando Meirelles still inherits his consistent style. Combined with his other work <>, you will find that, In his movies, there are always many characters, but they always appear hastily, and they end in haste. Maybe when Fernando Meirelles wanted to show the length of the movie time in real life, he had to choose a lot of cutscenes. To explain some of the plots that have to be explained. So although the plot seems tortuous, it always makes people feel that it cannot be done in one go.
From the reduction and emphasis of this film on the content of the original novel, I obviously feel that Fernando Meirelles is more Concerned about female sexuality and male dignity (also in <>), I think this may be just one of his creative tendencies.
And he tries to restrain the erotic scenes, deliberately avoiding certain parts of the organs and The duration of certain actions, the only remaining man's butt, the woman's breasts that often flash by, and the bed scenes that are only heard but not seen in detail throughout the whole chapter, are always in an embarrassing movie-watching atmosphere. If Pasolini is still alive, I would
love to see him direct this film, I think only he can make the filth and the filth, the vile and the depraved flow in the light and shadow like a meal Drink as natural as water.

View more about Blindness reviews

Extended Reading

Blindness quotes

  • King of Ward 3: I will not forget your voice!

    Doctor's Wife: And I won't forget your face!

  • [first lines]

    First Blind Man: I'm blind.