Great video Beckinsale is great

Tremaine 2022-03-22 09:02:25

Some people feel that revealing that the little girl is the source is a failure at the end, because the state will not convict the little girl for her innocent words, and even this fearless protection and sacrifice of female reporters becomes meaningless. But I have to say that, apart from the ending which surprised me a little bit, I also have more respect for the female reporter's adherence to the principles before, even though she finally compromised. Because she does not measure interests, but the conduct itself as a reporter, I also have reasons I believe that if it wasn't for "revealing" the little girl, it wouldn't have brought bad consequences to the person who was exposed. If that person was an adult, the female reporter would have continued to endure it.
From the ending, the reporter's crime was in vain. She herself said that if she had known this earlier, she would not have written this report at all. But as a reflective person, we should see that the real problem is not her stubbornness. As myself, I understand that I should look at the contradiction more deeply And sin. If a person is robbed, he will complain later that he should not choose that way to go home at that time. This is because we are accustomed to compromise with people and things that are stronger than us. The premise of this complaint is to accept that the strong can The power that is unfair to us. But forget the most important point, this kind of power itself should not exist. But people, often weak people, are accustomed to stand on the side of power to measure right and wrong, just like being taught by teachers when they were young Children who are discriminated against are often scorned by the whole class. This is because even children, growing up in such a society, have no reason to feel secure in power, and can't wait to stand on the side of power, while those of power cannot wait. The opposite can be insulted and damaged. Maybe this is why, we can't kill people, but we can sentence the death penalty in the name of the law with peace of mind. Therefore, when morality and law are closely linked, justice and truth can be guaranteed. Well. Isn't our evil vented through power in a repressed and distorted way?

View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews

Extended Reading
  • Devon 2022-01-09 08:02:04

    Some movies are so quiet that 90% of them are incomprehensible, giving people the feeling of a bad movie, but at the minute after watching the ending, there is an urge to give this movie six stars.

  • Sofia 2022-03-26 09:01:10

    Natural Born Killers is shocking enough. It is not a strange thing for cnn to be a thug. The story begins with a reporter stealing state secrets with a gossip mentality to win the Pulitzer, and the final confession is a kind of atonement. Since you're both right, it's the agent's own fault, and her daughter's even more so. Let’s be so entangled, anyway, without communism, there is no interest and human nature without tricks.

Nothing But the Truth quotes

  • Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!

  • Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.