A. Find the right movie for
you B. Find the right mood to watch the movie
C. Find the right mindset to watch the movie
D. Before I understand the movie
and watch Happy-Go-Lucky, I thought I had done enough Ready to work. I have a mindset like this:
A. It may be deeper, but at least it's a comedy-fun movie.
B. British films, should mean cute British accents, a little bit of ruffianism, plus British self-joking.
C. The discussion on the attitude towards life, in the light humor, is profound, but brings people hope.
But I admit I was wrong, this movie is a concentration camp for depressed moods - those subtle but intense emotional conflicts pierce people's hearts, you try hard to endure the pain, waiting for a warm response, only to get a deeper one tingling. Until you finally saw Poppy say to the coach: "Let's have a talk", you ignited a little hope, and felt that people's language communication ability was finally put forward as the final solution, but what you waited for was a short "This is the end of it. ' confession.
My feeling is: when my mood of watching the movie was ravaged to the lowest ebb and I was waiting for the director's great redemption, the director mocked and said: I just want to see your psychological endurance.
The core of the whole film is the attitude of life - no matter what you face, what should happen has already happened, you can't change whether it happened or not, but you can change the attitude to face it - if the world is not good or bad So why not laugh at it?
This is a very suitable theme to reflect in a bland life, and the choice of the protagonist is very dramatic: Poppy's life is bland and even a bit depressing from many angles, and there are indeed many unsatisfactory things in life. But she chose to face it with a happy attitude, which made her not abundant life appear rich, and every little thing was full of fun.
But the paradox of the movie's failure is that it doesn't address the question: why does a happy person always try to infect others with his own happiness, especially if it fails repeatedly, and it even backfires in the end the result of? Why would she make herself uncomfortable in this way? Is she Jesus Christ "making atonement for you with my body"? Or is she simply masochistic and neurotic? At least I didn't see an explanation.
Even if the Poppy girl is an angel reincarnated, how could God send such an angel so simple that it can only be described as an idiot to save our indifferent selfish ideas and worldviews? If you're a coach, can you laugh at your academy's third time on the road and you'll be joking with you off the steering wheel? At the meeting, I said honestly, "Are you NC!?!" Poppy's excessive mental retardation has changed the plot of the passion for life with social indifference. I think many people will raise a heartfelt sentiment. Share the disgust for this silly big sister who doesn't know understanding and respect at all. "I'm just born to be sullen, which hair is it offending you!?!"
Besides laughing, laughing, giggling, and giggling, don't we have any other means of communication? Throughout the whole play, can you count a few normal question-and-answer exchanges? Either it’s just repeating what other people said in a different way, or it’s just that you say that the bull’s head is the same as the horse’s mouth, and the most extreme is the stammering beggar who stammered for a long time, and God didn’t know what he said, and then came with a serious face. A "Do you know?" saw Poppy nod his head like a chicken pecking at rice. I'm going to yell, "Damn it! The Theory of Human Understanding was written by an Englishman!" The
movie shows us that the person who loves life the most is actually a very kind NC. She has no ability to express and communicate, and her life is in a mess, but she still tries her best to make people happy through her ignorant, boring, and even in some occasions completely out of place clumsy jokes. feel. As a result, all her efforts were of course unrewarded or even counterproductive.
Of course, Poppy's performance is still very successful. Her laugh sometimes seems a little low in IQ, but she is not contrived. Her efforts to change others are very clear, but the script makes her never step on the idea. The rhythm of the film is not slow, there is no redundant content, and the clues are still clear. I hardly think the above-mentioned unsuccessful paradox is the fault of the director or the screenwriter, I think it is pure mockery and malice by the director.
But I have to say, the director succeeded, and I was completely defeated. I watched the movie without taking my eyes off of me, and I was a complete mess of depression, and I was in a gloomy mood.
View more about Happy-Go-Lucky reviews
