Monthly, a killer who likes to play on the Internet, made a website by himself, and put the social scum that he thought should be killed on the website. There is an amount under each person, which is basically a large number. If the viewer thinks that this person should be killed, they will deposit a sum of money in the Swiss bank account of the month, as long as the set amount is reached, the month will act, and there are no false positives.
The bounty killer in the web2.0 era, right? He represents the public opinion and eliminates harm for the people. Yue has also become a national idol. Although the police have been chasing them, many police officers secretly agree with this practice and transfer money to his account. money to support his just cause.
Buying a murderer like this, the individual's sense of guilt is greatly diluted by the participation of the group.
Although they need to pay a little money. And the murder accomplice of this film, just need to open the website and browse.
Comparing the two, it seems that the cost of doing evil is far less than the cost of doing good, right? Perhaps paying a little price will make people who "unconsciously do evil" wake up.
From other perspectives, several symbolisms of this film are also worth pondering. For example, the first video of the torture and killing of kittens directly points out the psychology of netizens "curiosity kills cats". There is also the next way to kill the TV anchor. The exposure is roasted to death under more than a dozen spotlights, because the TV anchor hopes that the higher the exposure rate, the better.
View more about Untraceable reviews
