The initial conclusion from this film is that the homicidal maniac is so crazy to take revenge on society, if I am not wrong. However, it is designed so that the "wicked person" can decide his own life and death. Is he choosing to sacrifice "a part"? Or keep it "whole corpse"? It seems to be very natural selection. But the question is, what power does the murderer have to decide the life and death of others? Is it just because of the evil deeds other people have, or is it smarter than others? In fact, the murderer is not even worthy of standing on the moral high ground to accuse others, let alone the final judgment. Even the state has no such power. If the majority can decide the life and death of the minority, and the smart can decide the life and death of the stupid, then civilization does not exist, and the Nazis, massacres, and power can do whatever they want. Burn Bruno today and fight Liu Shaoqi tomorrow. Society can have the role of restraint, but it must not have the ultimate power of life and death. Therefore, the restraint of prison may be indispensable, but the death penalty is beyond the authority of human beings. [By Vincentspring]
View more about Saw IV reviews
