At the beginning of the movie, there are animations and real people, real scenes and special effects, but we never thought that it was a children's film!
Originally, no matter how ugly it is, we can still enjoy watching the movie through criticism, but this children's film is not technically poor, you can make it.
Can you criticize it for being vulgar? But people are still exposing money's manipulation of the properties of all things. It is estimated that in the second half, the chaos will be brought back to its original state;
can you criticize its superficial performance? But it's just to amuse children;
can you criticize it for masking its characters? They also specially invited Rain (later, it seems that there is still a local product Yu Nan, the lineup is quite international, and these two Asian actors and actresses regard it as a stepping stone to enter the North American market);
you can criticize its poor plot It's common to see the first half and guess the second half and even watch the first 2 minutes to classify it as an inspirational film? There are also many adult audiences who are quite engaged and amused by the gorilla actors and young actors who are constantly spilling dog blood in the play;
can you criticize it for being tedious and boring, and even the special effects have no Finding Nemo at all? Maybe I can talk about this. Later, when I saw a certain magazine, I couldn’t help but wonder: Could it cost $300 million in exchange for a complete children’s film?
Seeing this sentence, I think it was wise for me and Xiao Hei to leave the stage early midway - we only got through, and there are even more unlucky audiences who have done it for us.
View more about Speed Racer reviews
