Instinct One takes peach suspense as its selling point, creating a precedent for peach movies. The clues of the story are layered and intertwined. The characters in the play sway for a while, and the real murderer appears and disappears from time to time. By the end of the play, the viewers will feel that they can't find the north.
In contrast, in Instinct II, the plot unfolds vertically, the characters' positions are very clear, and the heroine's opening is a straightforward statement. In just a few minutes, the character's foundation can be figured out. So the director can only make a fuss about the plot of the movie, but unfortunately the script is inherently insufficient, and it did not have the amazing effect of the previous episode. On the contrary, because the plot is too difficult, it gives people a flashy feeling.
In addition, Sarangstone's attitude in the two films is also quite interesting.
In 1, the detective played by Michael is used as the main line of the movie. Saranstone is inserted in the play. The interspersed and ups and downs of Catherine in the movie make women psychedelic and the mysterious feeling is amplified, which is also the source of the peach color of the movie. .
In 2, after a few years, a woman has become the protagonist of this film. The opening character is replaced by Catherine, and the heroine is full of slutty and high-profile as soon as she appears. Apart from giving people a sense of lewdness, there is no peach fun. charm. This is undoubtedly the reason why Instinct II feels bad.
In the final analysis, machismo likes a woman who wants to hold a pipa half-covered, even if the plot does not allow it (such as 1), it has to find a man who can compete with him (such as the police detective played by Michael), and feminism like Instinct 2 is one-sided. Is it still possible for women to see his works?
View more about Basic Instinct 2 reviews
