What is needed in the face of massacres?, Reivew on Shooting Dogs

The film strongly expresses the dissatisfaction with the withdrawal of the UN troops and the powerlessness of the priest and God. I feel biased. The nature of the UN peacekeeping forces determines that they cannot interfere in the internal affairs of other countries and participate in the suppression of rioters. Their withdrawal is only out of frustration. After all, politics is complicated, and the politics involving many countries are even more complicated.
I have a feeling, however, that when we see this inhumane massacre, what can we find other than grief, anger, and powerlessness? What do the Tutsi need? Not a UN peacekeeping force! Not God! What they need is a revolutionary! When the lives of everyone in the entire race are lost, what they need is resistance! It's a revolution! instead of pseudo-peace!
800,000 people were killed in this massacre! And they are mainly facing some mob! It would be especially clear what the outcome would have been if some of these people could stand up and organize the Tutsi people against the atrocities. A nation that does not know how to resist is pathetic, and a nation that relies on outside help will never achieve true peace. Peace, in your own hands!

View more about Shooting Dogs reviews

Shooting Dogs pictures