Personally, I prefer the role of the defense in court debates (shark is an exception). If you discuss popular cases with others, you are used to thinking in the role of the defense. My point of view is absolutely against the death penalty and felonies. There are many reasons for committing crimes. It is really strange to work on how to retaliate without addressing the root cause of the crime. The strangest logic has existed for thousands of years. The root of crime lies in society. The last line of Xingye in Wu Zhuangyuan Su Qier is very classic: If the emperor manages the country well, where will beggars come from? By the same logic, if there is no soil for crime in society, where can crime come from?
Every criminal suspect may be innocent, and every victim in every crime is not necessarily innocent. Everything is possible. Take the case of the sponsored boy in Hainan who killed his godmother and raped his sister. I personally think that the boy is not guilty of death, and may even be innocent. Why has no one investigated what the godmother and sister have done? ? Perhaps their insults to his personality had inspired him to resist? Perhaps the purpose of their funding is for the exchange of flesh? Did anyone doubt it? No one is innocent, and no one is necessarily guilty.
guilty? not guilty? who konws?
View more about Boston Legal reviews
