Roman Polanski, who has been legendary throughout his life, is himself an Oscar for best foreign language film. In the future, there will surely be people who have nothing to do with this public, who will use his name to accomplish their own things. I hope that such a beautiful work will be born. In this case, the trivialities of introducing him in the works of "Mr. Roman" can be avoided. And speaking of Mr. Roman himself, he has personally experienced the experience of "The Pianist". His mother died in Auschwitz, his family was destroyed in his childhood, and he experienced the murder of his wife and children by the "Manson family" in his adulthood. The girl was wanted by the United States for 31 years and finally interprets the legend of the "come out, always have to pay back". All these after-dinner conversations will be covered with stars and stay on the red carpet in Hollywood. In this way, Roman Polanski may be right. It's a bizarre legend of existence like a movie! Well, I just imagined it so casually. Returning to the book, after watching Roman Polanski's latest popular work "God of Killing", I actually didn't have the urge or thought to raise my hand to speak. Because I cared very much about the text cannonballs falling like butterflies and flying flowers, hitting my heart, and each sentence exuded the fragrance of Lady No. 24 Fabulous Street. It seems that the talent of the new French female dramatist Yasmina Lech is a magical skill without a trace, acupuncture points in the void, directly knocking away my fearless nonsense cell, leaving only the experience of looking up and obsessed. , I’m full of praise, and I don’t have to think about gentleness anymore. In other words, I really like some playwrights who are full of strange and beautiful structures. Those thunderous heroes will not mention it. Martin McDonald, Kim Young-hyun, and Asano Taeko are shining in my limited field of vision. In addition to famous names such as Yasmina Leizha, Mr. Liang Zuo, who died young in China, regretted that he failed to become a novelist, but I think that "I Love My Home" is enough to become a master of literature of Mr. Liang Zuo. It seems that I have digressed again. In terms of speaking, I probably just want to talk about this story from the stage of the West End and Broadway in London to the front of the camera. After changing the pot and stove, it is still the original drama. I remember when I was a child, I used to hear my grandmother say to her friends: "You can enjoy the blessing when you are old, don't worry about them, your children and grandchildren have their own blessings!" Her elders did "stock" their children and grandchildren in this way. Thinking about it now, this sentence can actually be rehearsed into a movie as a lead. Just want to ask Yasmina. Lei Cha, why did you have a pair of microscope eyes, and God’s favor gave you a head like a recording pen and an inexhaustible artistic inspiration like a spring... There is no doubt that you can talk about the movie "God of Killing". As a playwright, the problem lies in the form of film expression, and the analysis is also very simple. It's over, you may only care about four points: 1. The actors played great, Christopher Waltz's lights are on! 2. Who wrote this play? I just think of life as a "best friend" inside and out, making people illusion that this is like the end of the world! 3. The director is great, where is the great? People are vying to play 3D and 4D because they are afraid that they will not be able to catch up with the trend. His old man was imprisoned at home and let the four actors walk around. The stunning masterpiece came out. 4Finally, I want to ask, who is this meeting point? The uncle neighbor who eavesdrops is familiar. Yes, we will reach consensus on at least two of these points. The fun of the plot seems to be impossible to generalize. Following the climax of each conflict, familiar faces that are memorable are buried under every line. Starting from the conflict between the children in the park, the conversion to an apartment triggered a battle between the four adult men and women of the parents of the two parents. Then they returned to the park to reconcile the two children, and paired them with small hamsters that can live freely in the wild. Ran away from my daughter's pet), the whole drama "temporarily" announced the end of the discussion in a closed or open ending, but the big bang is still going on. For such a reincarnation end to end, what I understand is really what my grandma said, plus a helpless "go with the flow". In fact, to discuss the right and wrong of the whole drama, this must be a thankless thing, and there is no way to discuss it, because life is everywhere in ruins, and the sacred place of personal thought is only open to oneself. The key lies in this search. In the contradictions and conflicts of reconciliation, they all naturally displayed different humanities in different backgrounds. Since I am not talking about right and wrong, let me briefly talk about what moved me by the plot of the movie. What impressed me most was the farce of throwing mobile phones at the end of the movie. Kate threw her husband Christopher's blackberries into the vase. The scene was really like breaking an egg to welcome the new year, full of joy. Looking at Christopher sitting on the floor deflated like a child, John was busy using a hair dryer to help Christopher dry his phone, and Judy joked that his husband was drying things with a hair dryer all day. This suddenly turned into The farce of confrontation between men and women makes people laugh. As a spectator, from the standpoint of a woman, I feel that men are very humorous and interesting. People who do not belong to the same planet are really happy to be together. Such an interesting plot naturally runs through the whole drama. The problem lies in the charm of the film text. This is a bit like drinking boiled water. If you are thirsty, you have to drink it yourself and taste it yourself. It is difficult for others to replace it. Obviously, casts like Judy, Kate, Christopher, and John must be called for the show, and this choice is Roman again. Polanski's wise move. Although they are all great gods, I personally like Christopher’s performance the most. He is the only one who "closes" the performance from beginning to end. Throughout the whole show, his character is the most full and three-dimensional, and the most complicated. He is indifferent and not at all, saying that he is calm is obviously not objective. In short, he has no hysterical outbursts, nor does he serve as a foil for warmth and warmth, but in the "dark battle" with Judy and his wife, he showed his ability to gag and play with his own. His wife Kate also showed a complicated image of a husband in the drama. Called his wife’s nickname, but when his wife was vomiting, she was quite indifferent. When she wiped the dirt from her shoes in the bathroom, she even commented on Judy’s desserts and cola maliciously. He never paid much attention to Kate’s condition. This is a lively play. It can't be added. In fact, most of the satirical effect of the whole play fell on Christopher and Kate, and it can be understood in disguise that their roles are two cards that create the black humor of the whole play. The telephone dialogue between John and his mother also played a certain role in rendering comedy, but Judy’s role made her completely break away from the “humor” that the world thinks. The serious and persistent personality must be related to “relax, don’t be so serious”. "" The argument is irreconcilable. As a result, he was cast into a rigid, persistent, serious, anti-war, and became an independent "person". It seems unlucky, but it makes people admire. Just like Christopher said, the war in Africa is suffering. Knowing that Judy can get along with her friend Jian Fangda (anti-combat). In short, this kind of "meshed fight" that you say to me, without the four superb acting skills, it is difficult to predict the effect of this drama. At this time, it all depends on the real skill of the director, the actors, and the script. Finally remembered a little story. A short story contest was held at a university in the United Kingdom. The content requirements were related to royal family, religion, sex and mystery. A female student wrote: "Queen Elizabeth is pregnant! Oh my God! Who did it?" It is said that the girl was awarded the Elizabeth Award by the Queen. Having said that, I always think that movies and dramas with stories and plots are infinitely attractive. Being vigorous is sometimes more effective! In fact, most of the satirical effect of the whole play falls on Christopher and Kate, and it can be understood in disguise that their roles are two cards that create the black humor of the whole play. The telephone dialogue between John and his mother also played a certain role in rendering comedy, but Judy’s role made her completely break away from the “humor” that the world thinks. The serious and persistent personality must be related to “relax, don’t be so serious”. "" The argument is irreconcilable. As a result, he was cast into a rigid, persistent, serious, anti-war, and became an independent "person". It seems unlucky, but it makes people admire. Just like Christopher said, the war in Africa is suffering. Knowing that Judy can get along with her friend Jian Fangda (anti-combat). In short, this kind of "meshed fight" that you say to me, without the four superb acting skills, it is difficult to predict the effect of this drama. At this time, it all depends on the real skill of the director, the actors, and the script. Finally remembered a little story. A short story contest was held at a university in the United Kingdom. The content requirements were related to royal family, religion, sex and mystery. A female student wrote: "Queen Elizabeth is pregnant! Oh my God! Who did it?" It is said that the girl was awarded the Elizabethan Award by the Queen. Having said that, I always think that movies and dramas with stories and plots are infinitely attractive. Being vigorous is sometimes more effective! In fact, most of the satirical effect of the whole play falls on Christopher and Kate, and it can be understood in disguise that their roles are two cards that create the black humor of the whole play. The telephone dialogue between John and his mother also played a certain role in rendering comedy, but Judy’s role made her completely break away from the “humor” that the world thinks. The serious and persistent personality must be related to “relax, don’t be so serious”. "" The argument is irreconcilable. As a result, he was cast into a rigid, persistent, serious, anti-war, and became an independent "person". It seems unlucky, but it makes people admire. Just like Christopher said, the war in Africa is suffering. Knowing that Judy can get along with her friend Jian Fangda (anti-combat). In short, this kind of "meshed fight" that you say to me, without the four superb acting skills, it is difficult to predict the effect of this drama. At this time, it all depends on the real skill of the director, the actors, and the script. Finally remembered a little story. A short story contest was held at a university in the United Kingdom. The content requirements were related to royal family, religion, sex and mystery. A female student wrote: "Queen Elizabeth is pregnant! Oh my God! Who did it?" It is said that the girl was awarded the Elizabethan Award by the Queen. Having said that, I always think that movies and dramas with stories and plots are infinitely attractive. Being vigorous is sometimes more effective!
View more about Carnage reviews
