Spent a day watching
shortcoming:
1. The progress is too slow. It gave me a feeling that a story that could have been told in 2 or 30 minutes was dragged to an hour, and because of too frequent slow motion and too much meaningless slow rhythm, I watched it at triple speed. There is no sense of inconsistency in most scenes. White space and slow pacing are all right, but using it too frequently is not good (I have reason to believe that if it was filmed on Netflix, the duration of the show would be less than half an hour).
2. Without logic, dig holes without filling them. I believe I'm not the only one, where is the speechless little girl? Why didn't she follow up on her mother's affairs? The two people who swap bodies are so different in character and academic performance, how much does the family care that their children can't find out? (Especially the one who is still awake, his academic performance is so poor, and his test scores after the change will definitely be very different. His parents don't care about him anymore, they all care about his grades, right? He is so good to his brother, and suddenly he doesn't. He knows how to draw, is indifferent to his younger brother, and his younger brother can't find out? His younger sister knows that it is her brother by just using sign language?)
3. The next few episodes made it clear about telling stories in sci-fi skins. If you can't see the first two episodes (to be fair, after watching it, I think the first episode, the episode when my grandfather died, and the three episodes where my father lost his hand are incompatible with the other episodes), the scriptwriters of the later episodes are completely rotten. I don't plan to make it round. All the unexplained and unreasonable things will definitely be explained to me as various reasons. You pursue reasonableness because you don't understand, and others say everything is silent. All kinds of "science fiction" settings are all about giving the green light to tell a story. Because of the sci-fi setting, it is possible to tell a story about the time-space suspension of the golden finger, and a story about traveling to a parallel world, as long as you pick up some broken things and fix them. . . . These two stories really left me the most speechless. I remembered a movie I watched before, a domestic ghost movie. The whole process really involved a real ghost, so the director explained in the last two minutes that the story was just a group of crazy imaginations. This treatment gives me the feeling that it is a kind of joke and irony of the director (there should be no provocation and soft resistance to domestic ghost films). Many viewers said that they felt that they were being played at the end, but I think the director actually wanted to It's an audit. There is indeed a ghost in the previous story, but what if the review fails? I said it was just a lunatic fantasy. Although this practice is more like dancing on the edge of gray, it can be regarded as a kind of resistance.
And what about this show? The setting is completely for the plot service. It's like I set all the protagonists to be sheep, so I can play the story of the sheep and the wolf wrestling. It is not intended to construct a convincing and logically coherent background world. I've seen a lot of other film reviews discussing the differences between soft science fiction and hard science fiction. They focus on different things, and hard science fiction may not necessarily be able to write logically.
But I always feel that people can't be worse. We can't compare to bad ones. My requirements for literary and artistic works are really not high. The only thing I require logic to have a certain self-consistency are science fiction and reasoning works. I really think that if these two themes are rotten, then they are real creators. The audience is treated like a fool. Human society also has laws to provide minimum living allowances, and the minimum living allowances for literary and artistic works are the audience's acceptance. Let's not think of ourselves as fools.
I didn't want to write this long
The advantages are not too open to talk about. 1. I like the first story the most. The strength of the little girl and the love for her mother are the ones that resonate with me the most. 2. The color of the picture composition. 3. Discussion on topics such as the beauty of the moment of death. Actually every episode revolves around love.
some others:
In fact, what I didn't understand the most was the episode of Lonely Island. The tone was so dark that I couldn't see many scenes clearly. The last part of throwing the prosthesis didn't understand at first, but after reading the pictures in other movie reviews, I could see what the robot looked like. I didn't see the part of the AI that "Dad" electrocuted when he was a child, but I personally feel that he threw the prosthesis not only out of sympathy or sympathy (he did sympathize with him), the prosthetic seemed to belong to the robot (look carefully The shape of the hand is the same as that of the robot's left hand). I am more inclined that the eyes were indeed injured by my father when I was a child, and throwing the prosthesis is a return to the original owner.
It's really too long to write. I didn't want to say so much. It also belongs to the series I don't know how to write again, so I don't want to type.
View more about Tales from the Loop reviews
