"Prince of Egypt" is a relatively unpopular masterpiece. I stayed up late last night and watched it. I was so excited that I didn't fall asleep until more than 1 in the morning.
Tell me how i got it
Recently, I watched a Japanese drama "The New Life of Nagi" at Xiaopo Station (also called "Leisure in Calmness")
There appeared such a scene:
Two people watch a movie that I don’t know what it is, and say things I don’t understand, making me look dumbfounded.
In order to carry forward the fine tradition of diligence and studious, the active and enterprising spirit of seeking knowledge,
I decided to find out this movie and have a look.
In order to find the name of the movie, I opened the barrage wittily,
Finally found a very inconspicuous name in the full screen hahahali-"Prince of Egypt"
I have to make a complaint, it won't be popular under this name.
Of course I can see that they are not watching this, obviously a live-action movie.
Regardless, read it first before talking.
Let me talk about my views on the so-called "three outlooks"
When I was in high school, our history teacher often said one sentence--
"We must look at the problem from the perspective of history. Regardless of the background of the times, anyone who talks about right or wrong is a hooligan."
Someone got angry after watching "Prince of Egypt", "white-eyed wolf", "cthulhu", and "retribution to wrongs", and they were not angry.
In fact, in my opinion, it is unnecessary,
If you look at the Western Bible 2000 years ago with the modern three perspectives of the East, it is obviously unacceptable.
Moreover, regardless of the East and West, many recognized world classics have concepts that do not conform to the three views of modern people.
For example, the various incests in ancient Greek mythology, the twenty-four filial burying the child and the mother, and the Yongquan leaping carp.
Regarding religious stories and mythological stories, you might as well take an attitude of just watching and not studying.
In my mind, "Prince of Egypt" is a magical work that can be filled with stars.
What really shocked me was not the plot, but the expressiveness.
To make an analogy, if you compare a movie to a speech, the picture is the speaker and the story is the writer.
The speaker of "Prince of Egypt" has undoubtedly reached the pinnacle .
The last work that shocked me in terms of expressiveness was Demon Man crybaby, and now I think that the Demon Man is in front of him.
I am not a professional, I only talk about feelings.
Here are a few scenes that impressed me very much-
At the beginning of the story, a series of scenes of the Hebrew being enslaved, coupled with low chants, intuitively make people feel the suffering of this nation
As a baby, Moses lay in the basket and drifted along the river, knowing that he had the protagonist's halo and could not die, but he would still worry about him.
The murals moved, exposing the tragic history of the Hebrews and the life experience of Moses
Repeated use of man-to-statue and mural paintings suggests that the tradition has been deeply rooted from the last pharaoh to Ramses, and it also indicates the stubbornness of Ramses.
When the two broke apart, Ramses' decisive action, combined with the rapid music, made the tension of opposition instantly stand up.
Ramses’ child stands in the position of the mutilated child in the mural, heralding the future fate of this child
Gray picture, there is no winner after the gunshot, both people are lost
The final climax scene: Parting the Red Sea
Finally, let's talk about the topic
I don't believe that "believe in God can be saved", but I believe that faith is powerful.
This power does not come from God, but from the act of "belief" itself.
A person who can make such epic works must have a powerful heart in his heart.
View more about The Prince of Egypt reviews
