If this film is to discuss various types of marriage, I prefer to call it a true reflection of human nature. Compared with the open emotional and emotional environment of Europe and the United States, my country's moral standards are relatively more conservative and restrained, which also determines our I am more accustomed to tying the relationship between the sexes in a cage of benevolence, righteousness, morality, courtesy, wisdom, and faith. This is also the point of view that often pops up in the barrage and that it is incomprehensible and that it is a spicy chicken movie. Its essence is just human nature. After reading the brief history of mankind, I prefer to look at problems from the point of view of genes. Men's genes determine that they need to pass on more blood for themselves. The translation is to find more spouses to continue the genetic inheritance, and focus on quantity over quality. This determines that men are more likely to cheat and advocate polygamy. Women's genes place more emphasis on the quality of continuation, choosing a better father for their offspring, and determining the strong attribute of women's mate selection. Ancient strong means strong body, contemporary strong It means money and power, and the same is true for animals. Females will choose the stronger males to mate, and the strong males will choose countless mates to continue their genes. Contemporary marriage shackles the nature of a man. Those who abide by that set of standards become a model good man of self-denial and self-restraint. Those who chase after their original intentions and do not obey become the scumbags and betrayers on the Internet. Here I have to feel the frankness and openness of foreigners. Faced with the problem of falling in love with others, I chose to have an open and honest interview. Every follow-up action of the male protagonist made me both understand and despise, full of details. Disgust and impatience with the original partner when choosing another lover; contempt and disgust for the heroine when she retains her; remorse when a divorce agreement is signed and the heroine expresses that someone is pursuing her and her lover's passion has receded. The anger and restraint shown by the heroine when they quarreled and turned over the old accounts, the joy brought by the fresh excitement when the two had an affair after each established a new family, and the dissatisfaction and jealousy when the heroine revealed that she lived in harmony with the current x. On the other hand, the heroine's mentality has gone from being hysterical and unacceptable after hearing that the hero is in love with someone else's showdown, to accepting it after the hero indulges and returning, to disgust and disgust for the hero after calming down, and to the two having an affair after many years. The excitement and love that are recovered from time to time are so complicated that it is difficult to imagine what love is. Maybe it is the moment when two people embrace each other. A woman's slow injection of affection and a calm determination to leave are destined to be quick and quick success with men. Not in a channel. As the old saying goes, marrying anyone is not for a lifetime, and the road is simple. Maybe marriage is two people resisting the erosion of time together, giving each other long-term companionship, and willing to accept the blandness of life and each other's flaws. As Romain Rolland said, there is only one true heroism in the world, that is to see life clearly After the truth, still love life. an unmarried
View more about Scenes from a Marriage reviews
