The film was made a few years ago, and I have always heard that it is very depressing. As a non-real DINK person, I never dared to watch it before giving birth, for fear of causing psychological shadows in advance, and then having children will cause unnecessary psychological burdens. Now that the baby is one and a half years old, I suddenly remembered this film, so I turned it out and watched it. It's not as terrifying, so depressing, so persuaded to be pregnant, so unfriendly to women. It may also be that such a dilemma has not been encountered in real life, so looking back, you will have a "but that's it" mentality. I always feel that, in fact, the biggest problem of the heroine is that the husband is almost completely not involved in childcare, or even if the husband is a useless firewood, then the month-in-law can solve almost all problems. But if you say that, it seems that family conditions are not too affordable for confinement, then this becomes a boring setting of "Poverty is the original sin".
So to solve the fundamental problem, it is better for my husband to help me more at night. It is true that my mouth is sweet and diligent. I don’t do anything every day, I don’t wash my clothes, I don’t drag the ground. At night, when the daughter-in-law sees the child as tired as a dog, he still plays games on the bed... Anyone will explode! If this is not resolved, it will always be a vicious circle with no exit.
This husband is like this, and the heroine can still say that she has chosen the right person, and it is also... true love.
And one thing I haven't understood is: Why get up in the middle of the night when there's already so much breast milk pumped in the fridge? Husband or Tully or other babysitters, it would be better if they warm up.
View more about Tully reviews
