Gai in this one is so annoying because he is not the same person in the first one. In the first part, he can work hard, take risks, and invent for a better life. And in this one, Gai eats lazy and gets nothing for nothing. I want a clean and comfortable "tree house", I want "privacy", but I don't know how to build my own home. Instead, I covet someone else's hard-built home - this is the logic of thieves. You don't look down on the living habits and environment of the old man's family, but the old man was obviously chosen by you. You knew their habits before you swore to their daughter, so why didn't you dare to dislike them at that time? I really can't stand it. It's still the same sentence. Find a piece of land, a tree, a water source, and build your own home. You are not a "civilized person".
Let's go back to the civilized family. What's wrong with the director trying to forcibly settle the charges against them and build a home with his own hands? Well, you said that the environment is destroyed, so you have to let the monkeys live in collectively? Obviously there are other solutions, right? And, in real life, there are still "rich parents" who are rushing to marry their daughters to non-single diaosi? Isn't that ridiculous! At least you have to give a few shots to show the diaosi's extraordinary qualities to be convincing, instead of using lame reasons like "childhood sweetheart" to kill the audience. The above, various behaviors based on the desire to "match my daughter and diaosi" have become extremely unreasonable, and even have a sense of abruptness. Finally, regarding the "sense of superiority", in my opinion, it is not a sense of superiority at all, but a few complaints after being violated: the walls of the house were destroyed, the crops planted were destroyed, the bananas that were saved were eaten, The house is full of dirty dirt... The so-called sense of superiority and irony are simply normal reactions after one's own home is severely damaged. The things of "civilized people" have been literally destroyed, and they are not even qualified to complain. ?
Most importantly, why should civilized people adapt to primitive people in reverse, instead of primitive people learning to live cleanly and hygienically? What is the director trying to express? "Although you civilized people are clean, tidy and polite, we barbarians are the kindest?" What is the difference between "you rich people have money and dignity, but we poor people are definitely happier than you". it is ridiculous!
Finally, I just want to know if this director is a senior black feminist. The whole feminism relies on that ugly and old wig bird. The bird didn't come back, and everyone didn't know what to do. Then clean up some useless slapsticks, paint faces, and give members new names... These are not helpful in saving people a dime, but make "feminism" look particularly naive, and it's just a show. In the end, it was not a person who was rescued, but an empty shell, and no feminist (except the heroine) discovered this along the way. Isn't this funny? Co-authored for a long time and I was moved by the net self.
Everything metaphors in this fragment is naked (refugees, race, gender, rich and poor), but it does not stand up logically. It has a very immediate sense of the director turning left and turning right. I guess that's why a lot of people find it awkward.
View more about The Croods: A New Age reviews
