Because Buñuel interspersed and edited reality, dreams/fantasies, and memories, without distinction/hint, the audience had multiple interpretations of the content structure of "Beauty in the Daytime". Especially the two endings, which one is true?
(spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider)
(spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider) (spoiler divider)
If you agree that Séverine, the heroine at the beginning, was insulted by the coachman as a dream/fantasy, then the Duke's Mansion and the happy ending at the end of the film are all dreams/fantasies. The basis is that the coachmen in these three scenes are all the same two people.
So at the end Pierre learned the truth and shed tears as the real ending, and suddenly stood up from the wheelchair should be Séverine's fantasy.
The two coachmen in the duel scene should also be the two, but it cannot be confirmed because there is no clear front view of the coachman holding the shoulders.
Some people in the comments think that the whole film is Séverine's fantasy, but in fact it didn't go out for a day. In that case, the whole film is just a sexual fantasy of a middle-class wife, and Pierre standing up from his wheelchair may have a real ending.
It is difficult to choose between the two conclusions. In contrast, I prefer the first one. Because Marshall robs the building and asks for money in the bar in the film, it is not from Séverine's perspective, and it is difficult to count as Séverine's dream/fantasy.
View more about Belle de Jour reviews
