Maze Runner series, the first is the best, the third is the second, and the second is the worst.
In addition to the chaos, this one finally has some ideas. WCKD, Cranks, and the uninfected in and out of the walls, it's all about survival and power. Different groups make their own choices in their own positions. Any judgment of good or bad, right or wrong, is the exclusive result of choosing a position.
The struggle for ends and the struggle for means can all be a reason for struggle. Sometimes, even though the purpose is the same, but because of the choice of different means, still have to fight.
Furthermore, evil means may not necessarily be out of good intentions or to balance the interests of small and large; good means may not necessarily achieve good results.
Furthermore, when a means of goodwill or a purpose of goodwill is very beneficial to the vast majority of people, if morally, economically, and physically, it seriously harms a very small number of people, should we approve or disapprove?
The film doesn't answer these questions in depth, but at least it raises the question.
As for the film's plot design, action special effects, etc., it is really lacking. It's passable by itself, but there are so many films of the same type in that comparison, it's nothing. From the beginning to the end, while watching, I was talking to myself, where the plot should develop, what the characters should say and do, who kills who, who will live, who will die. More than 90% of the directors do what I want. It can be interpreted as logical, or it can be interpreted as too routine and nothing new.
American blockbusters are too templated, and they are becoming more and more politically correct. It’s really boring to watch too much, and there is no essential difference between them and various domestic dramas. The difference is that it is technically more sophisticated.
View more about Maze Runner: The Death Cure reviews
