"Mrs. America" has nine episodes in total, each of which is wonderful. At the moment when feminism is sweeping the world, I want to think and analyze equality from the perspective of anthropology and biological evolution:
The subordinate social status of women for thousands of years is determined by the living environment in which physical labor can create more wealth for thousands of years. This adaptation is the best choice for human reproduction and survival. Some people (women) are more delicate and delicate, while others (men) are more powerful. This is the result of human beings themselves self-optimizing/choosing for survival. So when God created man, was he sure that there was a man and a woman? I am even more suspicious that there was no gender at first, and then the gender was divided for the continuation of the species. Therefore, the physiological structure, psychological response and social needs of different genders of human beings interact, influence each other, and constantly change and adjust, and the purpose is only to adapt to the reproduction and survival of the entire human society. Nowadays, the social value generated by manual labor is gradually shrinking, and men in the traditional sense have gradually lost their competitiveness in society, while women who can also create value through mental activities have become outstanding women in the non-traditional sense. Through these social phenomena, we can look at the characteristics of human beings as a biological species: men and women are getting closer and closer to each other in appearance, female men and pseudo-girls all show that the part of the two sexes has developed towards neutrality, the development of test tube baby technology, fertilized eggs are in It is not impossible to complete the development of external hair, which also promotes the convergence of the traditional social division of labor between men and women. Since then, the differences between men and women will only get smaller (from biological traits to social division of labor). Thousands of years later, the affirmative movement won without a fight. This is the result of natural selection. There is no distinction between men and women, only neutral people. At that time, there may be no need for marriage, maybe two people live together as a partner (now gays are the forerunners), those who want to go to work go to work, those who don’t want to go to work have children at home (the developed countries are the first in Northern Europe), and the family/partnership roles are not divided between men and women. This is back to the beginning (no gender), there is no difference, and it is not suitable for species evolution, and then this species moves to other planets and further evolves/mutates into new species... So this question, from anthropology From the perspective of evolution, the analysis of species evolution may be more objective?
View more about Mrs. America reviews
