General White-haired was invisibly labeled as a bad guy from the beginning. He was bad because he ignored the lives of more than 2,000 people and wanted to destroy this place. But the problem is that this is "the only way to minimize the possibility of the virus spreading." It is not wise in a sense to control the virus through a vaccine that has not been tested with any drugs: because of the lack of a drug test, we do not know how long the drug will last, whether there are side effects, or whether the cured person Continue to carry the virus and so on. (Don’t forget that in science, it takes decades for any vaccine formulation to be developed from the beginning to its wide application.)
But all the possibilities above are worthless under the impact of more than 2,000 live lives. Almost everyone Gritting his teeth at the white-haired general. I don't know how many people besides me would think about the internal suffering of General White-haired when he made the bombing decision (the director didn't think about it either, obviously).
Therefore, the development of the film was logical. A hero appeared and started to work hard. After untold hardships, he finally succeeded, and then saved thousands of people. The white-haired old man became a clown. The trajectory can be imagined.
What if it is not 2000 people, but one person is infected with the virus? In some societies, we require him to dedicate his life. In some societies, we must take the initiative to kill him. In some societies, no one has any right to deprive him of his life.
View more about Outbreak reviews
