I saw some film critics commented that this film is an anti-educational and introverted film. However, the biggest feeling I felt after watching it was not the inversion of the book, but the fact that the foundation of the famous school was too obvious. The background of the famous school gave people more choices and provided more possibilities for diversification.
The male lead university was admitted to Indian Institute of Technology, the best school in India, and was assigned to the worst dormitory H4. Saying it's the worst dormitory doesn't mean these people can't study. It refers to the best sports seedlings, all of which have been dug into the dormitory H3. So that the dormitory H4 has never won the school-level sports championship.
The whole story is about the male protagonist and his H4 friends, who worked hard in the sports field for the sake of shame.
Later, the male protagonist and his friends, who are nicknamed losers, were very good in their career development.
From this point of view, this is more like a story that packs successful people into losers, and tells how successful people face difficulties and setbacks and work hard to change their status quo.
The camera does not focus on ordinary people who have not been admitted to prestigious schools or even universities.
The failures described in the movie are more focused on the fact that you work hard but may not necessarily bring good results. What you have to do is keep trying and fight, not give up. For example, continue to prepare to review World War II, and strive to enter a famous school in the second year.
It is not just hard work, but also a strong mentality and a strong physique. Otherwise, even if you are admitted to a famous school, you will still be laughed at by others if you are not good at sports.
If there is a conclusion, it is a comprehensive and excellent development, and I don’t know if it can be biased towards one corner. Just focus on studying hard.
Especially when there is no efficient learning method, this kind of effort only accumulates ineffective study time and creates an assumption of hard work. When the expected result is not obtained, I mistakenly think that I have done my best, and I have no hope. .
Another perspective is that the curse of education’s plundering of high-quality resources to form a positive cycle is too strong, so strong that individual struggles may not be able to break through.
For example, why the dormitory H3 can win the championship of the school sports competition for many years, because he will continue to analyze the data of freshmen, and dig the excellent sports seedlings to their dormitory H3.
Then why did they dig in? Because the hardware and software conditions of the dormitory H3 are very good, from the accommodation to the cafeteria to the level of people you can get in touch with (international students) are completely beyond H4. So much so that the director can only focus on the dormitory H4, the relationship between them is good, just like family. However, what is hidden under the camera is, is there no such relationship of loyalty in the dormitory H4? Not like family?
This is more like a metaphor in reality, why the school district will be involved in kindergarten. Because of the accumulation of the initial state of resources, it will continue to expand like a snowball, until it reaches a value, so that students who do not have such resources, his efforts will be in vain. For example, students who study for 18 hours a day cannot pass the exams for those students who read books for 4 hours a day.
This is true educational despair.
In fact, online education has obliterated this unfairness to a certain extent, allowing people in the middle to have the opportunity to narrow the gap between themselves and the head education by paying. But the negative impact is to further widen the gap in educational resources between the middle and lower groups. further aggravated social conflicts.
This is actually a kind of paradox, that is, the optimal solution for the microscopic individual is the root of the problem for the entire macroscopic. And this paradox is not based on personal will. It's like the gap between the rich and the poor is getting bigger and bigger, so that the cards will be reshuffled when they reach a critical value.
Continuous macro adjustment will delay, but for individuals, it is still the best policy to actively embrace the micro optimal solution.
View more about Chhichhore reviews
